• DrCake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    6 days ago

    Apple being shit at AI might actually be a blessing. When the bubble pops, they won’t have lost so much, and until then they can get AI companies to pay to be the Siri model (not sure if that’s what they are actually doing though).

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think Apple could do AI as well as everyone else. They just recognized that everyone else is doing it badly because there’s no good way to do it so they backed out.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is literally Apple’s business model. It’s intentional. They are intentionally focused on slow sustained growth rather than the incredibly volitile BS other tech companies chase. Late to the game? Nobody cares. Something is a flop? They weather it. The butterfly keyboard was a disaster for Apple and it didn’t hurt them at all. They can take the blow if then the occasional flop because their risks are lower and planned out. They let everyone else spin their wheels while they iterate their designs based on what others failed at.

      The M-series chips going gangbusters on AI is no coincidence, but at the same time, if the buyer doesn’t care about AI, that unified memory benefits them in other ways anyway. Because they planned out everything.

      Which makes the Apple mouse that much more baffling.

      • boonhet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        The Apple mouse is fine, you leave it on charger when you go into a meeting and you’ll have a few weeks of usage again.

        Probably wouldn’t buy one personally, but if you want to use gestures on it, it’s pretty decent.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    6 days ago

    Honestly. I’m ok with this.

    Google: Fix google fucking drive. Stop this AI shit and put the billions of dollars into making your products basically functional.

    • cRazi_man@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      6 days ago

      At this point, anyone disappointed by Google has self inflicted wounds. Unless your employer forces you to use it, there’s really no excuse to not Degoogle.

      • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think of all the unified tech ecosystems, Apple is hands down the best but Google is still the best non-Apple option. The only other option I think is Microsoft, and I would rather drown in burning gasoline than go back to anything Microsoft touches.

        Obviously the best option is to host your own stuff through open source, which I am doing, but it’s taking time, it’s a lot of work to keep up with. Google gives me a bunch of barely passable tools accessible from anything with an internet connection.

        I did degoogle for browser and search though. Firefox and Kagi makes the internet almost tolerable.

    • ratel@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      GoogleDrive has always been hot garbage and now it’s just glazed hot garbage. Best to just leave unless you’re forced to use it by your employer.

  • LeftReddit2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don’t buy it. I really do think this is just a weird form of advertising. Like, “WHOA THIS AI IS GONNA KILL US?! I wanna subscribe to see how powerful it is!”

    Absolute bologna. Just total hogwash. I mean full on horserubbish!

    • DisasterTransport@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      We’re basically already at a point where most enterprise documentation is written partly or entirely by AI, and then read mostly by AI. Eventually true understanding of e.g. how to build a docker-compose file will be genuinely rare. And they want to apply that model to everything.

      The risk isn’t that GAI will decide, in an Asmovian sense, that the best way to make peace on earth is to kill us all, or that to achieve it’s manufacturing quota it must transmute all matter in the universe I to paperclips. The real risk is that the MBA-wielding professional-managerial class will not be able to resist the siren song of demolishing labor with something that works “well enough.” Eventually they’re going to put it in charge of something critical like ATC or dam control or the electrical grid.

      Humans, by our nature, are diverse, and one fuck up rarely cascades through the entire global system. We make small fuck ups and train each other. AI “learns” by observing and probabilistically imitating, and one model could be deployed in a thousand places and screw up the exact same way.

      tldr ai won’t kill us, our bosses will once Anthropic wines and dines them

        • DisasterTransport@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          the best way to make sure everything is some flavor of fine is to keep learning new practical skills. I got pretty doomery there. But the other technological trend that can’t really be stopped is decentralization. Communities can, and will continue to be able, to grow their own food and produce their own power. Knowing how to make thst stuff happen is going to be incredibly important in the rest of the 21st century

      • Avicenna@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Something that works well enough? But who will think of the shareholders then? Isn’t it just fabulous for them to increase their 10 billion to 10.2 billion by abolishing all human skill from the surface of Earth.

      • 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        If they do put it in ATC or dams or whatever, and there are deaths, I am optimistic enough that there are enough politicians isolated from it that they can ban AI from those usecases. I don’t really think AI will ever effect 100% of earths population directly enough that it can’t be controlled

        • Toga77@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          What about the current state of the world makes you confident politicians would do a damn thing?

          With all due respect, the US quite literally has a pedophile running it.

          Nothing has been done about this at all, it’s been years now.

          • 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Well I’m European so I’m coming from that perspective. Our politicians, while not perfect by any means, some of them seem to care atleast a little bit about our world. Not every politician supports AI

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s known as “criti-hype”.

      Google:

      • Criti-hype critics: We have to rein Google in, they spy on absolutely everything you do, and as a result their advertising is like a mind control ray!
      • Google: Hey advertiser, did you hear, even our critics say our advertising is like a mind control ray, that’s why you have to pay us so much.
      • The reality: Google doesn’t even know enough to avoid showing people ads in languages they don’t understand despite all their settings and all their usage being in a different language.

      Palantir

      • Criti-hype critics: Palantir tech must be stopped is so powerful that a human isn’t even needed in the decision loop!
      • Palantir: Hey government, did you hear, even our critics say that we don’t need a human in the decision loop!
      • The reality: Palantir suggests bombing a school.
  • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    AI is a tool to do mass layoffs without making your stocks devalue. What happens after all the major companies do mass layoffs? Not a question investors are interested in, so it must be an externality with no barring on economics.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This is the best explanation of the real reason for the glorified search engine I’ve heard yet

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        The purpose of a system is what it does, not what it’s intended to do!

        Gotta give credit, I stole this insight from Cory Doctorow.

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Apple has always been late but made existing things more efficient and better. So just wait for few years and apple will find more efficient way to kill us all. \s

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      No. And with the newer, wider form factor that Samsung started using this generation and clearly Apple is also using, there has been more excitement. The trifold phones have also generated a ton of excitement. That trifold Huawei looks amazing, but us Americans can’t have it. I strongly considered a folding phone for my traveling job. A phone that could fold out tablet size for TV/movies/books sounds great for the plane/hotel.

    • Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s really great if you like phones with extremely obvious points of failure. My wife had a zflip where the hinges got stuck and snapped, and they replacement they sent her had the flex cable inside malfunction to the point where it felt like the phone was going to melt. Two different ways to fail in the same spot. The future is here!

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      A bigger screen can make many tasks easier. I’d quite like to be able to see a decently large terminal window and a keyboard at the same time for instance.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Upgrading every two years because the old one broke, rather than because of a crippling addiction to consumerism?

    • kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I get for people wanting the larger screen size that folds, but I’d like one of the smaller ones so it’s not as heavy and fits into smaller pockets