• Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Conceptually? I’m all for it. Why wouldn’t I be.

    In practice, we live in a capitalist society and I don’t want an arm that makes me watch an advertisement before I open a bag of chips.

  • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 years ago

    Not against it on principle, but there’s no way I’d get it knowing about the way the corporations that have the resources to make it happen operate.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    There are a lot of different human faculties that can be augmented!

    We augment our senses every day with tools like microphones, microscopes, radio, radar, telescopes, X-rays, cameras, etc.

    And when our senses fail us, we augment them with eyeglasses, hearing aids, and so on.

    We augment our legs with bicycles, skateboards, cars, airplanes, etc.

    And when our legs fail us, we augment them with braces, crutches, wheelchairs, electric scooters, walkers, etc.

    We augment our memory retrieval with writing, library science, search engines, and regular expressions.

    We augment our ability to measure lengths with rulers, measuring-tapes, and surveying equipment.

    We augment our immune systems with masks, rubber gloves, antiseptics, antibiotics, cancer therapies, water treatment, etc.

    We augment our sexual functions with erotic stories and art, contraceptives, lubricants, sex toys, dating apps, etc.

    We augment our metabolic function with cooking, fermentation, agriculture, selective breeding of crop species, etc.

    We augment our musical abilities with horns, percussion, strings, synthesizers, and more.

    It turns out that augmenting human ability is itself a core human ability.

  • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Wearable > implantation

    Just a security concern. Augmenting is great but we don’t want the augmentations to become a liability. Obviously there are exceptions to every rule, if we invent a robotic arm replacement for someone who’s lost one, the security concerns are generally lower than the quality of life improvement of having a functioning arm 99% of the time, and there’s an argument for the potential ability for rapid detachment in case of emergency, but once we get into subdermal and brain implants, we’re in a territory where these things can’t be easily removed in case of emergency, and the risks get immense.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 years ago

    As a already augmented human, i fully support this.

    Glasses, portable electronic tether, surgery…

  • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel; I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine.

    Your kind cling to your flesh, as if it will not decay and fail you. One day, that crude biomass you call a temple will wither, and you will beg my kind to save you.

    But I am already saved.

    For the machine is immortal.

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Depends on the implant. I have to imagine the only way this kind of thing could be adopted mainstream is for it to be open source, the risks are just too high to let some random company put obfuscated proprietary tech in your brain