• Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Anarchy only helps those privileged enough to have the means to defend what they have with violence.

    Anarchy means the sick, disabled, poor, minorities, etc are thrown to the wolves, and expected to defend themselves with less capability and resources than the majority.

    Sure, you might argue family units or communities might band together and take care of each other, but they probably need some rules to make that equitable since not everyone will agree, and- oops we made government again.

      • Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have visited wikipedia. So you mean the anarchy that is “without hierarchy or authority” but not complete chaos?

        I guess I’m unclear how you manage that without it devolving into chaos though. Like corporations constantly prove that if we don’t have a law against it they’d just sell humans. I dunno how you manage to make an equitable society without some kind of rules and enforcement of said rules, when there will always be bad actors.

        It’s a more complex concept than I assumed, but I struggle to conceptualize what that kind of system actually looks like.