

It existed before dyslexia specific fonts existed and there was a dedicated effort to create them.
It became popular early on for dyslexia because it just happened to be really useful for dealing with the issue.
Compared to a specific font designed for dyslexic people it doesn’t hold a candle to it. But that doesn’t make it bad for the job either there’s a reason it got popular for that usage in the first place.
For like a good 10 years it was basically the only good option. Nowadays there are just much better ones and anyone still using comic sans I would hope it’s just using it for silly things.


Normally I would be all for peer reviewed, but this is a fantastic example where that’s a stupid fucking metric.
Comic sans existed before efforts to formally make a dyslexic assistance font.
Comic sans has been casually recommended by many dyslexic communities and assistance programs because sans serif fonts are helpful and fonts with unique letter shapes are helpful.
Comic sans for many years was one of the only fonts that fit both categories. But by the time formal efforts went into place, comic sans quickly became unneeded in the space. There’s no reason at all TO do a formal study on it when it was never intended for the use case.
What studies there are in fonts from the time lean towards it being helpful for reading speed and understandability in children. But none of the studies of the error really focused on dyslexia so at best you can only infer based on adjacent findings it even then it’s loose at best.
Point is just because something doesn’t have formal research on it doesn’t make it not true and that years of casual helpfulness just vanish.
So get off the little petty wagon where you hate something just because it’s overused. Comic sans is a useful and fun little font that just gets over used.