Smacks of “don’t dead open inside.”
Slow that mind child
Since I invariably wind up getting “name suits” types of comments, here’s the explanation behind it:
Around the turn of the millennium, I was trying to come up with a username to use on a particular site that had a shortish character count limit for usernames. My goal was something related to the fact that I would often be making my points in arguments with “holier-than-thou” types by taking what they were saying, and turning it on its head so the offensive stuff was directed back at them.
I also happened to learn shortly beforehand that many years ago “'ape” was somewhat commonly used as a verb to mean “imitate” or “copy.”
I’m sure you can figure the rest out.
Smacks of “don’t dead open inside.”
Slow that mind child
There goes that heroic duo again!
Especially with the color choice. To me blue indicates it’s the cool thing to do, while red equates to “stop, don’t do this.” Yet the “only” thing you’re supposed to do (whichever one one it actually is) is printed in the red background. WTF were they thinking?


But he said the war was already over! 🙄


No, but they are close enough to that to be having economic effects upon Taiwan by reducing the number of potential trading partners willing to risk inviting China’s wrath. Ship captains would likely rather avoid a run-in with China’s Navy.
EDIT FOR ALL THE DOWNVOTERS:
Sourced from this post.


One could argue China is right on the borderline of effectively doing that, likely scaring off some trading partners and thereby causing economic impacts - albeit significantly less severe than those currently experienced by Cuba.


Taiwan brings major economic (and other) benefits to its “supporting” countries via its technological exports & is thus too important to allow to fall into China’s hands if it can be avoided.
Cuba brings… cigars?


Real men are far too hard to find, anyway. They’re mostly insecure AF children overcompensating for… things. It’s always the little things that fuck everything up.


(Yes, I got the reference - now get offa my lawn!)


It hasn’t been truly capitalist in a very long time, if ever.


So they can be any characters? Can they all be from the same show?


They blame the stroke he had just before the 2024 primary for his personality change, but there were clues that this was really him all along. Another excuse I’ve seen which I find slightly more believable (but only because the groundwork for it was already there) is that he became highly dependent upon social media - and thereby more radicalized - after his stroke prevented him from communicating normally.


With a crispy crotch looking good enough to feast upon.
You know they tube feed patients in comas, right? The patient presumably didn’t give consent, and yet I’m pretty sure that’s legal. Doesn’t even have to be a “too much junk food” coma.
Yeah, sorry - NO. It’s basic threat assessment, nothing to do with ethics. Those who attack a child do so because they are weak bullies taking advantage of an easy target - which obviously requires a lack of decent ethics, but not attacking that child doesn’t mean the choice was made based upon ethics.
TL;DR: Correlation != Causation.
I’ll see myself out, thx.


Good. They’re long overdue for their “divide & conquer” schemes to come for them.
deleted by creator


Only slightly lower than to be expected, IMHO. Seems to me one can divide the population into roughly thirds: strongly right, strongly left, and those who shouldn’t ever vote because all they care about is themselves, their little world, and what their favorite pop-culture icon says - a.k.a. bobbleheads.
“Crap! Another asshole who stuffs his pants.”