sanitation@lemmy.today to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 5 days agoThis is why Americans hate Socialism.lemmy.todayimagemessage-square145linkfedilinkarrow-up1967arrow-down126
arrow-up1941arrow-down1imageThis is why Americans hate Socialism.lemmy.todaysanitation@lemmy.today to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 5 days agomessage-square145linkfedilink
minus-squareheartSagan5@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down6·4 days agoAnarchism is an assured destruction of the Social Contract. People, without guidance, are more horrible.
minus-squareDoc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoDecades of anthropological evidence say otherwise. Read Graeber’s works on the subject. They are incredibly enlightening.
minus-squaredecolo@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 days agoYou know anarchism doesn’t just mean ‘anything goes’, right?
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·4 days agoBut it does mean nobody to enforce the rules, which means no rules.
minus-squareCommunist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 days agoNo it doesn’t, name one anarchist society where this was an issue in the real world. https://anarwiki.org/wiki/List_of_Anarchist_Societies point to them here
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoAnd the largest one in that list is…? And the longest lasting is…? Just because you can balance a knife on its tip doesn’t mean that that’s a stable configuration, and if anarchism is not stable, why bother talking about it?
minus-squareCommunist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 days agoThat’s a different point, we can move onto that one next if you’d like, first i’d like you to concede your previous one. simply admit what you said has never happened in the real world, and anarchism doesn’t mean no rules, it means no rulers. Unless you have an example where that happened on the list, where that was the reason for the collapse.
minus-squareathatet@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 days agoOh wow. How very convincing. I guess you got me.
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·4 days agoMy argument was just as high quality as yours.
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·3 days agoPerhaps you should do more than just read a book and look at the real world?
minus-squaresome_kind_of_guy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-24 days ago[citation needed]
Anarchism is an assured destruction of the Social Contract. People, without guidance, are more horrible.
Decades of anthropological evidence say otherwise. Read Graeber’s works on the subject. They are incredibly enlightening.
You know anarchism doesn’t just mean ‘anything goes’, right?
“No rulers” doesn’t mean “no rules.”
But it does mean nobody to enforce the rules, which means no rules.
No it doesn’t, name one anarchist society where this was an issue in the real world.
https://anarwiki.org/wiki/List_of_Anarchist_Societies
point to them here
And the largest one in that list is…? And the longest lasting is…? Just because you can balance a knife on its tip doesn’t mean that that’s a stable configuration, and if anarchism is not stable, why bother talking about it?
That’s a different point, we can move onto that one next if you’d like, first i’d like you to concede your previous one.
simply admit what you said has never happened in the real world, and anarchism doesn’t mean no rules, it means no rulers.
Unless you have an example where that happened on the list, where that was the reason for the collapse.
No it doesn’t.
Yes it does.
Oh wow. How very convincing. I guess you got me.
My argument was just as high quality as yours.
Lol read a book, my god
Perhaps you should do more than just read a book and look at the real world?
[citation needed]