

Because there’s a monopoly on violence and they set the boundaries of that violence.


Because there’s a monopoly on violence and they set the boundaries of that violence.


This. Politics delivers what is expedient, not what is difficult. Meaningful change starts with our culture.


It’s a nation of laws and if that fails we need to break the law? I can’t say I disagree on the latter but that seems to negate the former.


And that’s how our system works. Ain’t it grand?


And even if he was, it was a minority of people who voted for him. Representative democracy my ass.


Yes this impacts everyone and everyone should be concerned. But the solution is in mass politics, not in “electing” another death cult leader. The conservative framework is fundamentally unable to address this issue.
Edit: after watching the video I would say the title reflects her audience.


That’s an ideal solution. The best solution is what works immediately and within your capabilities.


At present, it is impossible to predict long-term technological developments and the evolution of consumer preferences.
Ah yes, it is impossible to know whether a consumer will still want faster Internet in the future. They could enjoy the retro experience of a dial up modem making noises when connecting.


Be sure to have a dash cam otherwise they will charge you with trying to run over an officer


“oh no, not again” 🤣


Selling a good thing like Medicare for all is a skills issue at this point. And if we keep hiring Democrats who lack that level of communication skills, then don’t blame the voters for failing to know what is at stake.


Does being blackmailed count?


I remember America before ICE, it was nice.


Voting for electability in the primaries is what gets us voting for the lesser of evils in the general.


Shout out to Schumer who said we would get 3x the votes from the GOP never trumpers by rejecting the left flank of the party.


Could still filter it down by addresses that show up at multiple places.


“I was aiming at the bird that was attacking me”


So worthless you could say it is a negative value.


A bellwether is whether the politician supports abolishing ICE. If they are willing to uproot institutions then that includes presidential immunity.
My 3 year old make more sense than this though.