

Biden might not be the GOAT, but he sure is the scapegoat. Getting rid of political enemies 101.
Biden might not be the GOAT, but he sure is the scapegoat. Getting rid of political enemies 101.
I need you to understand that UX/design has been made super easy in order to attain more users. This in turn makes it easier for children, who are then also targeted by the likes of YouTube kids.
Devices and operating systems nowadays are dumbed down to a fault to control you as well, since you’re not supposed to be tech literate enough to move to a competitor.
The barrier to entry is low, and adversely, the barrier to exit is also made really, really high.
I’m speaking from personal experience here buddy, but I agree with you.
Hey, woa. The new “History makes great leader feel owies” law has been broken. People in uniforms have been dispatched to your location.
Incidentally, your Spotify has been scanned ahead of time and you’ve been found guilty of having 1938 counts of DEI music.
Also incidentally, you’ll get to ride the train line that has just been built! It goes straight to El Salvador.
Adding incident to incidentally, they have brand new showers that don’t even use water.
This has become so apparent that relations between Arabs and Jews have started to heal. It’s hopefully even more apparent that Israel is apart of soft US imperialism and geopolitical interests in the middle east.
Don’t get me wrong, certain Europeans powers are apart of it, but seeing calves being prepared in the US to be shipped to Israel for slaughter to fulfill some biblical wet dream has mega church vibes to it.
The same for fascists and nazis then too, right?
OoOooOO!! Someone likes a STWONG MAN :3 UwU You gonna suck Trump’s dick? That’s very LGBTQ+ of you…
The problem with that idea is that the Dems have been about the status quo for so long that it’s literally why Trump won. People aren’t voting Dems because they went the “don’t rock the boat” route for so long.
The Dems need a reform.
He really is relying on Norwegians? Shit. Didn’t knew we had that much power. Who knew narcissism could be a political power point? Well, everybody, I guess…
Why are you people so bad at reading, or are you just trying to misdirect?
You either missed the point entirely - or you’re trying to ignore it. But that’s why we use simple language and conveyance to dismiss such tomfoolery.
Pure ethanol… right? Pure ethanol is illegal to sell as a beverage. With me so far? But ethanol… is the effective ingredient in alcohol. Understood? Good.
You keeping a bottle and drinking it… is not the same as distributing it as a beverage in say a store, a bar, your grandma’s house, etc… Yes? We can’t make it illegal for you - that’s you in your private home - to destroy your body by drinking it yourself. Agreed?
But… if you then… go give that bottle to someone without informing them “hey bro, this is pure ethanol - this shit’ll burn your cornia”, and by neglecting to do so, they go blind when drinking it? That’s what we call wilful negligence - in legal speak.
If you do that, then you deserve time in prison for wilful negligence and causing bodily harm to someone. Right?
Or… are you some sort of psychopath? Or perhaps a libertarian? I’m a socialist libertarian, so let me know if you need to learn something about why law is still important and why causing harm to others - be it intentional or not - should be illegal. Here’s a hint: we still need licenses for running major industrial machinery for a reason.
Allow me to hit back. No. But by that token pure ethanol that can make you go blind should also be sold over the counter, right?
It sort of is a “nanny state”… or a welfare state. In any case, its to prevent deaths caused by dehydration. 60 is allowed, but everything upwards is not.
It’s really bad if the wrong person gets a hold of it too. Suddenly latent psychosis gets triggered - which could have been healed by itself over the years, but instead destroys a life that then will become a burden to their family and the welfare system. It’s also what could lead us right back to criminalization.
Most of the irresponsible stoners in this thread don’t get that, because that care only about themselves, but as a civilized society we can’t just let that stuff run rampant.
Grow… it… yourself… but do not distribute WITHOUT… informing… of THC content…
Got that, cookie? Does it enter into your skull? Do you understand why? Of course not.
Do you ignore the article because it doesn’t suit your agenda? Yes. Are you a licensed neurologist? No. Are you a licensed therapist? No. Do you understand why it’s a problem? No. Do you care? No. Are you a selfish little goblin? Yes…
They could grow it themselves and not distribute it without telling people what it contained…
This is why high grade is bad, because it impedes ones reading retention - apparently.
Not if it’s 60 proof - not in my country anyway. Then you’d go to jail - and I’d say the same should be for high grade.
My case is still - if you bothered to read - that high grade should remain illegal, but that low to mid grade should be legalized.
Why bother using words? Maybe I should just smash my face on my phone. Seems to be working for you guys.
…can you read? I wasn’t talking about dispensaries. I was talking about home grown high grade - but also: high grade in general would be illegal in my country based on how we already regulate other drugs.
Not that you give AF about your countrymens well being, which we know you don’t when you intimate that you would actively grow skunk and distribute to people without warning people about the THC content - because you’re an absolute irresponsible sociopath.
Or, you can’t read.
Which one is it?
It’s not opinion, you irresponsible doofus, but verifiable fact at this point - hence the article.
You can’t prevent people from growing it themselves at home no, but selling high grade over the counter? Heeeell no. Not in my country.
That would get cannabis super banned almost instantly after legalization, which would be dumb, counter productive - and irresponsible.
And if you went around distributing it without clearly informing of it’s THC/CBD ratio and the implications thereof?
Straight to jail - because it could be a costly, irresponsible form of stupid, that could cause harm to someone else and lasting damage to them - all because “that shit be hype”?
One year in prison. Same as when selling ethanol. No exceptions.
“One hit shit”. You mean noisy, loud, tweak head shit. Why not skip a step and go straight to meth? Maybe synthesize a concentrate you can inject straight into your groin even. Call it groinnabis. Smh.
Listen, I tell my countrymen all the time: we want to legalize, but only "low grade* to “mid grade”. I.e not high grade. We’re kind of strict though, almost dry state. Why?
Skunk and the likes have been bred to maximize THC content at the cost of the CBD content. The problem there being that THC is psychoactive and in strong amounts can even be sort of psychedelic, whereas CBD is an antipsychotic that counteracts the negative effecta THC has.
The bigger nut though - and this is the frustrating part - THC can never actually cause psychosis, but can bring out latent psychotic tendencies or be part and parcel of bringing onset psychosis - but a drunken stooper or even an intense run could do that too.
When it comes to high grade tho: do not fuck around with it. If you’ve never tried cannabis, make sure you don’t get a skunk type strain or anything that is deemed “heavy”. It’s not necessary anyway, it’s just a stupid trend between bros to try to out stone or out high each other. “Ooo, I’m the most high! ha ha ha ha”
It’s been an arms race between breeder for decades now regarding maximizing THC content, but let me just say gtfo here with that noise. Give me a working man’s spliff any day, thank you very much. We’re supposed to function as well.
Oh, I one up them by self identifying as a socialist libertarian.
Before they know what hit them I’ve already explained why pretty much all constitutions need a rewrite to be understood by the common man, why energy companies and hospitals should be cooperatives with stock ownership divvied up to the local populace and why Montesquieu’s decentralization principle should apply to both law, capital and that it hasn’t gone far enough for military or police.
I destroy their tiny little minds and they don’t know what to do with themselves. Seize the means of capital, my brother. Usurp the system from the inside.