If it’s anything like Reagan, there’s probably going to be some revisionism.

Can private security be crowdfunded? /s

A lot of others “losing” secret service protection is quite a clue to how the new regime expects violence and intimidation to be enacted.

At the very least it should be his handle/nickname in jail

Soul

Jon Stewart outlined it pretty well.

The Dems put this artificial moral framework around themselves that limits how well they can compete with the Right, because it’s important

But as soon as they need something for themselves or their family they just break it.

They never break it for the people who need it most.

It doesn’t have anything to do with Trump. But that’s not to say he won’t take advantage of it.

They’re not mad at Don Jr because they don’t want to be. That’s all.

I’m pretty sure this was part of their plan. It’s now legit cover for Trump to pardon whoever they want.

Plus yeah, they want to talk smack. It’s not like they have any worthwhile policy ideas.

It’s to make the point that they were murdered. It’s a fear tactic with plausible deniability.

I have a funny feeling Jeff doesn’t own the paper for the money.

I won’t understand until I hear piratesoftware explain it.

The “fuck spez” map drawing from Reddit

I don’t think we know the details (beyond the blood test) because it’s privileged medical information.

She identifies as a cis female though (and was assigned Female at birth)

Soccer was invented in England. How’s that going for them?

This is an excellent shitpost and made me laugh very hard.

Bot, are you OK?

You know it’s a sliding scale, right?

There’s not just three choices.

There’s Far-side, side-wing, side, side-leaning, center-side for both (plus center).

Then you have fiscal Vs moral lean on both sides.

“no right wing talking points” is hardly left wing.

Not left wing. Just left.

None of them are left wing (maybe Green has some left wing stuff?)

If something was written by V3 and then published, that text doesn’t get updated every time a new version of chatGPT comes out.

The text isn’t dynamic.

It could be a new level added to the peer review of work. Nothing to do with the university. Just “other professionals”.

A thesis isn’t just an exam, it’s a real scientific paper.

And usually claims is contents as fact, which can be referenced by others as fact.

And absolutely should be open to scrutiny so long as it is relevant.