If you’re too childish to have a conversation, you could at least make your note clear.

Same. Though I did love split-screen black ops zombies on the 360.

He OD’d

Why am I tripping balls starter pack

Are those cold/frozen fries?

E chu ta

What? No. That would be crazy.

I write BDFPR from the bottom.
Though I’m also a heretic who starts G from the middle, so don’t listen to me.

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Hat_Riot.
And then a few days later, hundreds of students and teachers protested this event in NYC.
Thousands of workers in the area then attacked the protestors and rioted throughout the city in retaliation.
The police formed a barrier to prevent the workers from reaching the students, but when this was breached, they gave up and allowed the rioters to attack the students/teachers.

The mayor called out the police for not attempting to stop the violent workers, and three days later the workers began their own protests against the ‘commie’ mayor.

The president later appointed the main guy leading these counter protests as his labor secretary.

Just typical american shit.

Do you say shit like that because nobody can tell the difference between your watch and a cheap one?

So, hormones don’t exist?
Intersex people don’t exist?
Trans people don’t exist?
And what, we’re all either 100% male or 100% female and there is never a grey area in biology?

Don’t make the conscious decision to remain ignorant, you’re keeping yourself back.

Agreed. I don’t understand the people who claim it’s easier to work with, or better for prototyping.

Automatic typing exists. Type casting exists and is even handled automatically in some scenarios. Languages like java and C# can manage memory for you, and have the same portability and runtime requirement as python.

Prototyping in python and then moving to another language later makes no sense to me at all.

I think it’s context dependent.

The field is called mathematics, but I see math as a short form of mathematic or mathematical.

Calling something a ‘math’ question or a ‘maths’ question both make sense. But something like “I hate math” sounds like you hate a singular mathematic, which sounds weirder to me than “I hate maths” (the field).

You look and sound like the ‘you on kazoo’ kid for the rest of your life. Even at 80 years old, everyone thinks you’re a 9 year old.

He’s got a real disney character face

Are most relationship counselors saying that though?
Like you said, professionals can be wrong, but I’d still be interested in knowing what the general consensus is.

I guess it’s hard to know without surveying them all.

Check their username ;)

We’re really just sharing opinions though, not facts.

I haven’t found any solid evidence that poly relationships are inherently more difficult or prone to failure than monogamous relationships. Long-lasting relationships are just hard in general.

I feel like there’s too many poly relationship structures to be able to generalise them all like that.

There’s plenty of people who have open relationships, where two people have a very close relationship (sometimes married) but they aren’t sexually exclusive with each other.

I’d also wager that some poly relationship structures would be more stable for lgbt people rather than heterosexual people, solely on the idea that everyone could participate more equally.

I’ve never seen a more perfect use of bog standard