lime!

we do have the submarine thing but i didn’t feel like doing that many conjugations

sköldpaddsagiterad magbesvärsutmattning

i used to have a phone with the “charging hole” on the left side near the top. your tricks don’t work on me.

hdcp-capable dongles usually turn the TV on by themselves. just try casting, see what happens.

outer wilds OST

and a cuban one, apparently

they didn’t tariff any embargoed countries, that includes cuba and north korea

they didn’t get tariffs because they are embargoed.

rocm is open source as well. amd have historically been the ones pushing for open standards in these things, probably because they’ve never been market leaders.

in swedish, being accused of having a stick (or, rather, a pole) up your ass means you don’t close doors behind you

sounds like HP. their version is awful.

hello officer

(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻

usually they’re curved.

when you write left-handed you push the nib into the paper rather than dragging it. left-handed pens have angled tips so the nib still drags.

this is left handed discrimination

you are framing a fundamental issue with the system as a positive, which is confusingly common for crypto advocates.

i’m not interested in this conversation.

this reads like a mad rant.

first of all, bitcoin in its original form was meant to be used as a transaction log between banks. it was never meant to be a currency on its own, which can be seen in the fact that efforts in scaling up to more than a few million users consistently fail.

in practice, all cryptocurrencies result in a centralisation of power by default, whether they use proof of work or proof of stake, because they are built so that people with more resources outside the network can more easily get sway over the system. by either simply buying more hardware than anyone else (for pow) or pooling more of the limited resource (for pos) they can control the entire thing.

cryptocurrencies are a libertarian solution to the problem of capitalism, which is to say, a non-solution. the actual solution is to limit the use of financial incentives. i’d wager most people on lemmy would rather abolish currency altogether than go to crypto.

in the case of anubis one could argue that the goal is to save energy. if too much energy is being spent by crawlers they might be configured to auto-skip anubis-protected sites to save money.

also, i’d say the tech behind crypto is interesting but that it should never have been used in a monetary context. proof of stake doesn’t help there, since it also facilitates consolidation of capital.

is it not pommes frites? fried apples?