An ICE agent murdered who now?

Why not restrict all non-individuals from contributing to political campaigns or ballot initiative drives.

It apparently wasn’t a hostile or violent murder, more like mamslaughter: they should have known better, but are apparently a bunch of dumb fucks.

Being angry cause they’re stupid isn’t as easy as being angry cause they are violent monsters… Protests are more common when people become enraged by severe violations of civil behavior by LEOs.

A protest here wouldn’t be any less warranted, but it would likely be less productive. The LEOs involved appear to just need better training.

I’m pretty rad.

Anything that is just local hardware can be saved or copied to an encrypted cloud drive of your choosing, via VPN if that’s what you want.

You don’t have to use a security cam system that hosts the cloud storage, or acts as a middle man between you and a live feed.

There are local systems that can host remote access portals too.

These things existed before things like ring or wyze…

Isn’t a published book ‘media saying something’?

Ya know, some people actually only get on social media for curated news, to have actual conversations with other humans, or to share or seek advice about specific topics.

I spend most my time in tech, old home remodel, and local/hometown forums.

Too literate… Use the wrong word in there somewhere, or mess it up some other way.

It’s going to be great, but it may not work.

Meh, in the end US voting rights have mm ratings…

Wouldn’t you want to also be on your own jury?

Direct and financial influence trumps merely financial influence. It could save the billionaire class millions in donations and bribes.

Look what it’s done for Trump.

Let’s get strapped!

I was just reading through a couple thousands of the financial statements and reports and scans from 10. Kinda interesting stuff seeing how millionaires manage their finances, private jets, and properties.

Can not both be true?

I only pee in other people’s showers.

Well, he is definitely trying to steal the Christian narrative from MEGA extremists… Kinda hits the same.

Are you in a movie theater?

Shouldn’t ‘tell them off’ at all either.

Teach to the problem. Or moderate it.

Allow the person to continue coexisting.

If you want to invite them to reexamine their behavior… Actually do that, not the other more aggressive, offensive, and immature thing… Then play it off as something more.

‘fuck you!’

‘fuck me?’

‘no, no, that’s not what I meant!’

Just say what you actually meant!

It’s funny watching this argument.

I’m from a very hippy community.

I’m a collectivist.

I’m extremely far left & progressive.

I’m wholly anti-fascist.

I’m also 100% in agreement with you regarding including differing opinions regardless of how extreme.

Inclusivity only brodens the divide and limits opportunities for people who harbor extremist views to be influenced toward developing more balanced, functional, and beneficial perspectives.

Moderation can be used to soften their influences in our commuty while including them allows our community to influence them.

‘You people’ is typically defined by the attached action. ‘You people’ are the people who actually do that thing, whatever it is.

If you don’t do it, ‘you people’ is not you.

If you do do it, ‘you people’ is you.

The point is not about ‘who’, it’s an oppositional statement about the ‘what’, the action, and implies it’s bad, or more importantly that the speaker doesn’t approve.

Like: ‘You people, always with the child raping.’

If you don’t rape children, ‘you people’ isn’t you.

But also, the speaker is implying that child raping is bad, or something they don’t approve of, and something they don’t do.