

Are you saying that’s happened? Or that you expect it will?


Are you saying that’s happened? Or that you expect it will?


With little to no attachment to one’s personal life, unless I’m mistaken.


I predict that in under 4 years, he’ll have run to Russia for sanctuary, where he’ll tweet for the rest of his days. He’ll make some kind of comparison between himself and Snowden. The media will start to report less and less on what he says, and people will pay less and less attention to him as he is no longer able to do rallies.
I speak English, I studied Latin but have not kept up, and I know a tiny bit of Japanese and French.


It’s honestly unkind to include it in the quote from her. Written down, it is seriously hard to read. But spoken aloud, your brain will filter “filler words” like that out without needing to think too hard about it.


I love it lmfao (lost my flannel at Orlando)


Do escapees of NK often express disbelief that the rest of the world dislikes the country they escaped from? Your question seems to be a non sequitur.


If you’re on Linux (or Mac), add an alias to your .bashrc:
alias activate="source env/bin/activate"
Now you can activate your venv by just running activate in the project root!


That’s certainly true. If I may ask, what point are you trying to make?


Jesus Christ.


I zoom in and this is the FIRST thing I see. What in the god damned shit?

Seems legit as a concept, though the author is giving weird vibes.
I’m not sure what “globohomo” means but it sounds like a 4chan homophobic term. Additionally the author says they wanted a search engine giving results without “political inclinations”, which reads to me as “reality has a liberal bias and I don’t like that”.
I’ll pass on this for now.


Honest question. Why do you think aggression isn’t a trait that can be selectively bred for or against? Surely you agree other traits can be bred – herding and pointing, to use some common examples.


What on earth is that link at the bottom of your comment? Are you…licensing it?


I am curious – why does the article including the names and photos of his accusers make this more credible to you?


That’s big of you, mate. It’s not easy to admit to mistakes on the Internet, and I appreciate you taking the time.


It’s also people so lost in the sauce they can’t see reality in front of them.
Check out this argument I had recently on lemmy. I was saying to someone that voting is important, even if we disagree with Biden on some very important issues, because abstaining is as good as voting for Trump.
And this person, who I think is the owner of the entire instance they’re registered on if their username is anything to go by, repeatedly and aggressively insisted that voting can never accomplish anything.
Reviewing their profile showed they’re pretty consistent in this belief. They seem to seriously think the ONLY option is violent revolution, and nothing short of that is worth a thing.


The man has been leading by example for years. Remember when, during the Obama presidency, he refused to even call a vote on any Supreme Court nominees?
He has shown time and time again that he doesn’t care about the unwritten gentleman’s rules that the government has been (more or less) abiding by for centuries, and now he’s shocked that his party is overrun by people with zero interest in working towards anything other than destruction?
He’s a fool and he’s dragged us down with him.
God fucking dammit