How much you wanna bet he’ll force this mostly on his enemies, Democrat registered voters and beyond.

Democrats registered voters are not US government enemies

Why on earth would the US government risk a public outrage when they can just keep the system as it is and have poor people enlist for money?

He’s not the one paying

Show them the pictures of the corpses and challenge them to look at these for more than 10 seconds

shame, shame on you

Europe is closer to Iran than America

“There was nothing left of her,” he said. “We could only identify her from her school bag, which she was still holding.”

I think it’s a legit question, when there’s a tragedy involving kids it’s always a big deal, politicians yells about it and media coverage goes on for weeks. Personally i know there is no difference between children but i’m genuinely puzzled about what is the answer according to government and media logic.

It’s more about what is not being said: more than 150 iranians kids recently died in a bombing and it was on the news for only two days, no minutes of silence or football teams wearing a badge for the victims, no politicians condemning what happened and sending wishes to the families involved.

The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these

"According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% "

Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don’t have enough to win ww3.

Imagine telling the russian government that they cannot use their military bases in YOUR country to invade ukraine. There shouldn’t be any US military base in Spain to begin with but it seem the Spanish government has a different opinion.

If you argue that the burger reich doesn’t have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn’t running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings)

How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_conflict

What makes China and Russia more powerful

You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda

The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles.

So are most countries

North korea has nukes too, that doesn’t mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn’t automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn’t spend in war as half of what US does.

They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet

russia and china don’t have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between

Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength.

They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is?

Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline.

To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US

The day US government will be unable to successfully attack a different country every month i would start to argue that they power is collapsing