Who are you talking too? Not likely to find many here.

I instantly read it in the melody of “everything is awesome” from the lego movie if that helps.

More like everyone is 92 because most kids today are smarter then this.

I bet if you showed this case, without political context to a class none would laugh and all would agree its wrong for officials to do this.

There is no single sign something is ai.

There are a hundred smaller signs that include both em-dashes, flattery and redundancy.

Its fair for the wrong reasons.

It’s fair because it is a peace symbol.

Its wrong because it is and will be used as a hate symbol.

furthest thing from a nazi

Gottem, AntiFa terrorist it is.

Iran has a complicated history having been one of the first and most progressive nations in the middle east.

They started a democratic parliament in 1906. Mandatory hijab was banned at some point in the 1930s. Women were educated and active in the professional sectors like lawyers and doctors in the following decades. Their royal family (shah) was still around but with decreasing authority, similar to many democratic European countries today.

Then a democratic elected leader wanted to nationalise oil the oil industry pissing off the UK and US

Operating Ajax was a CIA/MI6 lead coup that overthrew the democracy and reestablished the dictatorship of the shah with extended power.

In return for giving them a large share of the denationalisation oil they even helped train a secret police.

This helped fuel an anti-west sentiment as the shah was considered a western puppet. Actual progressive Political opposition got crushed making religion the primary public voice of dissent.

This turmoil ends in the islamic revolution and republic that dominates that eventually reversed all the progressive laws and brought back a mandated hijab for women.

These regime still rules today but you would be mistaken to consider them real representatives of the people. The majority of women today are still educated. Since a protest a few years ago there is mass civil disobedience, especially in big cities.

In effect 2025 the government of Iran has lost legitimacy towards the people but they still enjoy lots of military might to maintain their technical position.

It might be fair to say that some religious people in power would still wish to invoke their views on all women and make this argument in spite of the Irsael-US/UK connections but to equate that to the nation/people of iran is inaccurate.

Hypernormalisation keeps coming to mind.

We can agree with the contextual sentiment without needing to support the person.

After all you can have a whole spectrum of opinions on something but to specifics al it boils down to is a binary pro/contra

I do.

A fuck of approval that is!

A minute of silence for every dead child in Gaza or nothing for no one.

My nerves when i see a police dog and some of my clothes are made from organic hemp.

Also to have them on both sides for accessibility and limited space.

Is there a centralised rule controlling organization (state) Does that organisation have a monopoly on violence?

If yes, that organisation/state is authoritarian. People have to abide to their will and dissenting to hard will be punished.

This is how science fiction is made! Special Meta materials are very under-explored, It seems reasonable that in a future high tech society they would be increasingly common.

Mostly we get “faster engines” and “advanced computermachines that sometimes perform unexplained magic”

Can we make liquids like that? Sounds useful in some situations.

It already looked like bottom on first glance, The shadows and light seem to verify it.

Agreed, just use common sense to judge wether or not other people then yourself may understand the semantics and context of written information works pretty well. /s

Am I confused on why people are overcomplicating the math and adding assumptions to a clear given.

• 60 applications a day.

• Half of them (30) buy something.

• Makes 300 per day.

• They must make $10 per vending customer.

We can safely ignore operating costs and sementics to conclude this is massive ragebait.

Devided? Between who?

Checks article: And Its berween the people who have lives there versus the ruling class who are about to profit because of course.