These kinda comments always fuck with me. Were you not paying attention? Is this some sort of pride in not paying attention? I’m 35 and noticed it was happening while I was in high school, why did it take you until a year or two ago to notice what was happening the entire time?
It doesn’t matter if you disagree, that’s what it is. Socialism is the economic system of communism and anarchism, worker ownership of the means of production, or at the very least the process of moving to that economy. It’s not compatible with capitalism and the private ownership of means of production.
I’ve found quite a lot of places don’t let you accrue leave, but if they don’t carry it over they have to pay you for it instead, so are very eager for you to use all your leave.
It doesn’t say anything about how you think they should be achieved.
It might not include many specifics but “by eliminating capitalism” is definitely one of them. Without that you’re just describing Keynesian capitalism.
Ah, you’re a world of imagination type. Sorry, I operate in real world effects, not in theoretical constructs that are totally different except for in what they actually do.
You don’t see how changes like that, extending the minimum time to be considered for parole (I.e released), would in practice extend a sentence?
Sorry, rereading I was completely unclear about which case I was refering to, and got my conflicts of interest mixed up - I meant the proscription judgement (https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2026/721?query=AMMORI&court=ewca%2Fciv) and Johnson wasn’t on this panel, his judgement is just based on it. The Suffragettes actions are specifically brought up as “civil disobedience” rather than “direct action”, which is a distinction the proscription kinda hinges on.
I find these comments really weird. “Look, I totally understand, but here’s a big list of things that show I don’t understand it at all. Like even a little bit. No, I won’t do any introspection and wonder if I might not actually understand”.
You might want to read the judgement then, because Johnson has a very different understanding - he very specifically names the Suffragettes as not being terrorists, despite their use of public and personal bombings and arson attacks to intimidate and influence policy. The law is not being applied equally, it is being used as a bludgeon against those who oppose genocide.
If the aggravating factor is added it will have an impact on the conditions of their parole, not the sentence itself
Where did you get this idea from? Aggravating and mitigating factors specifically apply to the length of the sentence in UK law.
Too many people here pretend to be more respectful and empathetic than average, but will happily dogpile to get a piece of a person given the right momentum.
“People here pretend to be nice, but get angry when I try to secretly push them out of the conversation”
Shut up, idiot.
Dutch cycling culture
French long lunches
Spanish siestas
Portuguese late dinners
Italian punctuality
Did you bother reading the report? It’s literally all speculation, with photographic evidence such as “they built a prison” and “something happened to a remote mosque”. You are minimising real genocides by speculating that China is somehow committing a genocide that nobody is able to actually evidence.
What do they do? Exactly? I assume you’re speaking with some sort of evidence of their alleged infractions, actual evidence with photos that I can personally look at like I can for the Gaza genocide, or the holocaust, or even the 100 year old Armenian genocide? Or do you just have the usual vague handwave that they’re totally doing genocide by enshrining their minority’s rights in law?
China is a genocidal dictatorship with world domination ambitions.
That’s only if you fabricate the genocide, ignore their actial political mechanisms, and randomly make shit up without any factual basis. The scary sinophobic propaganda isn’t actually real, it’s just racism.
Meanwhile the UK is actively facilitating the most widely publicised genocide ever, has made opposition to said genocide illegal, and is currently involved in 3 wars on 2 continents, neither of which is Europe. The rest of NATO and America has similar current situations, and track records that make their current ambitions seem positively milquetoast. It’s painfully obvious that you’re just projecting the failures of the west onto it’s enemies like a good little McCarthyist.
Screaming Females have a cover of Shake It off that absolutely fucks: https://youtu.be/Zm1-bVYio1k
Yeah, everyone’s so mad that slavery was banned and black people were legally obliged to be treated equally. Civil rights act, more like civil rights crap, we hate the idea of equality.
I don’t think you understand - there aren’t contemporary cases because theres no one left resisting. They killed all the actual opposition, and now Americans think protesting means holding a “no kings” party in the park and not disrupting anything or making any real demands. Social democrats are being held up as socialists because they fund enough community programs to keep capitalism limping along. The American government is more than happy to kill it’s internal opposition, but that requires internal opposition to kill.
come back to me when the US start murdering all internal opposition
What do you mean start? They already finished that, now you think democrats and republicans are opposed to each other. Fred Hampton, Kent state, MOVE, McCarthyism, Blair Mountain - the US already killed it’s internal opposition, and now has the leadership that results from that.
Is you attention span limited to your immediate surroundings? Do you think your home unaffected by geopolitics? You chose to stay ignorant.