You can’t teach if you don’t identify where the students are getting things wrong and correct them. It’s one of the major reasons why teachers deserve so much more pay. My wife used to be a teacher, and she worked 2-3 hours past the end of school correcting students’ work pretty much every weekday, and spent several hours every weekend planning out her lessons for the following week. She got paid significantly less than me working in a basic entry-level 9-5 office position.

C’mon now… They don’t actually look at the conflict. Someone pays them to support one side over the other, and so they do.

My wife and I will sit in the same room for hours and never speak a word to each other. We only talk when we have something to say, and we’re both happy with that relationship. My sister thinks we’re crazy, but we like it quiet.

It all makes sense when you realize who makes the cutoff for what they consider “people.”

I didn’t even think it could mean anything other than that until I started reading the comments. Coming from Trump this certainly reads more like a “finish them!” than a “leave them alone!”

Basically, it comes down to whether or not a meaningful amount of people can be radicalized without being personally impacted by the radicalizing force. When the government comes after its people with an armed secret police, the people who are worried they’ll be next are easily radicalized because they feel personally in danger.

The well-meaning members of the various branches of the media and education system that drives the propaganda machine are not directly in danger, at least not from that specific aspect of their lives. They may still be a marginalized race or sexuality who could be radicalized through that aspect, but those people are already being systematically removed from their impactful positions within society by DEI restrictions, likely specifically for that reason.

In the end, it will be a bunch of straight white people running the propaganda machine, who may be sympathetic toward the plight of their marginalized neighbors, but likely not enough to endanger themselves to try to fight back on their behalf. And by the time white people themselves are on the chopping block, there won’t be enough power left to wield against the tyrants if we aren’t fighting for it.

We can get people scared for their lives to band together and try to fight, but we can’t get people who are still holding out for this whole thing to “blow over” to risk it all to try to force it out. But everyone is inching toward that point of personal endangerment; if we can be strategic, maybe we can hold out on the fighting until enough people are personally affected enough to be radicalized that we form a real fighting force. That’s really the only way through I can see, and as I’ve said, it’s a long shot even then.

And what if a nonviolent movement randomly made all the wealthy explode? It’d be great, but not feasible. The reason the propaganda machine works is because it’s backed by an amount of money only the wealthy would be able to provide. For us to build one powerful enough to stand against theirs right under their noses within this surveillance state is the least likely scenario I’ve seen seriously brought up.

Propaganda can and will villainize even the most peaceful of people if it serves the goals of the wealthy. It’s simply too powerful of a tool; a huge swath of the population will follow a narrative that’s being pushed hard enough, no matter how much it goes against their preconceived understanding of the world. Just look at how many people wholeheartedly support Israel’s ongoing genocide. Sure, there are absolutely examples of Palestine committing violence against Israel, but I have no doubt that even if they’d never raised a finger, the propaganda machine would still be convincing a huge portion of the country that Israel is right to massacre them.

I’m afraid of the government using its insane weapons technology and budget against us, but the real danger is that they won’t have to - that they’ll just tell the propaganda machine to make our own neighbors fight us, and we’ll kill ourselves to achieve nothing more than their amusement. It’s true that we might be able to appease them to prevent that outcome by promising we won’t put the wealthy on the chopping block, but at that point, we’re not people, we’re cattle. They’ll have no reason to treat us any better than North Korea treats its people. Our government would fully turn from an organization meant to serve its people, to one fully committed to using them as a resource to be exploited - capitalism’s final form.

I wholeheartedly believe that the only reason we’re not at that stage already is because they’re afraid that if they take that final step now some people might get violent and hurt some of the wealthy or their property. If they actually believed we’d sit down and allow them to enslave us, they’d be shipping in a bulk order of manacles from China right now. You’re absolutely right, I don’t believe we’d win, but I’d rather try to escape the fate of domestication than welcome it.

That’s true, they likely have the ability to kill us all at this point. But if so, then they’ve patched the last hole of resistance that the common people had to fight back. It’s either try and maybe succeed, or don’t try and definitely fail. There’s a reason we have a right to bear arms, and it’s because bearing arms is the only way to fight back against a government that no longer cares about upholding its own laws and ideals to protect the people.

People are so conditioned by the idea that nonviolent change can be achieved that they will actively work against those who use the actual effective methods. Like crabs in a bucket we’ll doom ourselves to the boiling pot of water. The constitutional right to a peaceful protest doesn’t mean shit when the president has already dismissed the idea that he has to uphold the constitution. At this point it’s nothing more than words on parchment that they’re supposed to care about but don’t. Don’t bet your life on their adherence to it.

Nonviolent change only works if those in charge either care about us and want to improve our lives (they don’t) or they fear that not giving us what we want will hurt them somehow (it won’t if you fucking help them get rid of the ones willing to hurt them). Even if we achieve the fabled halting of the economy from so many people refusing to work that it can’t sustain itself, the rich will be the ones who starve last. There will always be people willing to do dirty work for evil men in exchange for gold and expensive baubles.

Because he knew nobody would actually enforce it.

Unfortunately, in the twitter comments that someone linked, you can see that he still staunchly believes that Trump was the best pick, and that a vote for democrats is a vote to “trans the kids.”

Republicans have been primed to treat their own suffering as a trial they need to overcome, and that was done specifically so they wouldn’t vote in everyone’s best interests even if it’s clearly also in their own best interests.

The joke is that it’s not yucky because while yes, it shows that you shit, everybody shits, so it shouldn’t be surprising or even noteworthy. They’re using it to tie into their actual point that parents talking about sex isn’t yucky because sexuality is natural, and discussing it shouldn’t be surprising or even noteworthy. Even in the case of asexuality, it’s still a discussion that should be had.

The vast majority of the people who would actually fight on the right side of history have been thoroughly pacified by the rhetoric that using a weapon would be unacceptably barbaric, and that if you can’t make the change you want with words, you’re just not finding the right words. We’ll be holding quippy signs and chanting about justice even as the country literally crumbles around us.

They’re wryly saying that when Trump inevitably ignores this latest of judicial orders, there will continue to be no consequences save for more angry reminders that he’s not supposed to do that.

Everyone already knows all the republicans supported it; anything under their jurisdiction is already a lost cause. What I want to know is how many people from the “left” party can’t even keep their own votes on the right side of history. It’s not news when villains are villains - it’s news when the people who say they’re here to fight back against the villains are caught supporting them, and it’s important not to drown out that important detail among a bunch of already-known regressives. People need to see that the current democratic party isn’t a viable defense against conservativism, and that we need to do something more to get things moving in the right direction again than simply trusting democrats to fix everything.

If by “we” you’re referring to the American people as a whole, then no, no we don’t. So many people I talk to are treating this like just another 4 years of republican shenanigans; I rarely find someone in real life who understands just how close we are to all-out war.

It’s true that we evolved in response to an environment, but the actual genetic changes that allowed for that were not developed with purpose. They happened randomly, and the ones that happened to provide a benefit made those individuals more likely to have more kids that those with less beneficial random changes.

Remember, there are 2 reasons why someone might say something. Either it’s the truth, which makes no sense as you pointed out, or it’s a convenient lie, which makes perfect sense for someone who benefits from maintaining the status quo while pretending to fight against it. It’s well past the time to assume people are telling the truth until proven otherwise. It’s time to just straight-up call a politician’s lie a lie from the smell alone.

Sure, but that’s often after they’ve let him spout nonsense uninterrupted on a global platform.