

None of it is satire, except in the way “You should be shot for watching Fox News” is satire.
None of it is satire, except in the way “You should be shot for watching Fox News” is satire.
Israel’s foreign ministry said it categorically rejected the report and called for the COI to be abolished. Israel’s ambassador to the UN in Geneva, Daniel Meron, called the report a scandalous and fake “libellous rant” that had been authored by “Hamas proxies”. Israel has declined to cooperate with the COI, accusing it of having a political agenda.
I appreciate you retreating to a more defensible mott. Swaying public opinion on a matter as a professional in a relevant field is allowing personal views through a professional mask, so we can agree that was an issue regardless.
Look, if this hypothetical person can control their Conservative urges enough to read modern science pertaining to their job and then act on it, and NOT act on their own beliefs, then i suppose, in a hypothetical modern, very accepting world in which this ignorance doesn’t fester into fascism and in which all grievances are addressed fairly and fully, i suppose you might have some vague philosophical point and it wouldn’t be irresponsible.
It seems incredibly naive to assume that no professionals personal views conflict with work place stances.
I guess. If part of your duties include giving medical advice or arranging medical procedures for people including pregnant people, it would be irresponsible both of the ignorant doctor and society to let that doctor administer anti-science medical advice, yeah.
if old people bother me
weird way to say “if I hold demonstrably anti-science positions on old people that will hurt them if i am not prevented from doing so” but yeah, basically. You shouldn’t work in an old-folks’ home if you’re gonna take your ignorance out on them. You’re probably fine to… i dunno… be a trashman or a programmer or something. It would just be irresponsible of both you and society for you to work with old folk in this case.
First amendment for the, but not for me.
for the what, BandDad? First amendment for the what?? /j
Is that what you read? What feels inconsistent or worth reexamining here, do you think?
I thought they quoted it because they liked it. I think it’s a sentiment I’ve seen repeated a lot here.
Claims to be pro-life ???
-Talking Points USA
World needs a lot more store clerks than CEOs, as it turns out
For my a second wish, boot Trump, too
REAL MERCH for TRUE CONSUMERS. I cannot believe that GAVIN WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.
SAD!
EDIT:THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
The guy with a HATE BONER for the dude who likes HELPING people (eww helping) is GOOD FRIENDS with the NAZIS? He’s sucking cheeto too? WOW! SAD!, even!
I dont think we’re trying to constructively critisize or reform the nazi party currently