

I mean, on the point of queens, they were still usually regarded as lesser. Just more of a “lesser of greaters” type of deal if that makes sense. Highborn man>highborn woman>lowborn man


I mean, on the point of queens, they were still usually regarded as lesser. Just more of a “lesser of greaters” type of deal if that makes sense. Highborn man>highborn woman>lowborn man


Holy shit how fucked are are that this is even news. I hate this so much.
I hate when a stupid motherfucker is right because, outside the gold, the marble looks way fuckin better than that green.
To claim that marble and gold is somehow more era appropriate for Lincoln is pretty standard Trump-alternate-reality delusion fueled by narcissism.


Yea, and you’d think you’d see more mentions of PMDD here as well.


I like that term. Gonna call it financial obesity from now on.


“help” repay the “help” for a fight that really only existed in Europe. The French Indian War was a subsidiary conflict to the 7 Years War in Europe.
Britain then chose to squeeze extra taxes from the colonies, who didn’t get a voice in parliament to protest forced participation in the conflict in the first place. Then remember that the British answer to the unrest was to HOUSE SOLDIERS IN THEIR HOMES. Imagine if Trump or some other authoritarian leader today responded to mass civil unrest by couch surfing soldiers through everyone’s houses. Very easy to imagine a revolution then.


I think they’re saying her whole career as an activist was an escalation from waving signs in the street (ie: the average person)
Because they were ahead on industry and slavery was less profitable. Don’t think England was going around thinking it was wrong.


That’s not how wildfires work. If it burned, the fuels have been consumed. This is why the Forest Service in the western US do prescribed burns. Forest fires are actually an essential part ecosystems.
I never thought I’d see El Pato ever referenced online. It’s my go-to. Dirt cheap and I can eat it by the can on tacos or burritos. Mix it with cheese for a really good dip for chips.
Their comment didn’t contain enough disdain for women.


It’s also worth noting that free range and organic eggs got hit waasaay less than your average factory farm egg, therefore it probably hurt Amazon a lot less to keep eggs low compared to other grocers.


Or the person you’re replying to, talking about an EX-house mate is the the immigrant. You’re reading suggestions that aren’t there.


I think that’s still small talk either way tho? The fact that you launch into some part of your day doesn’t change that it’s gauging your mood on her end. You could just as easily answered: “Snoozefest, how about your day?” or “Nightmarish headache from start to end, hold me”. See how these are all logical answers that would (I hope) evoke a different response from your partner?


There are plenty of games that aren’t $90 and are actually worth the values they charge. Not everything is priced like a AAA dev pushing their yearly slop of their main franchise.


Is or is not talking about how your days went considered small talk? I literally don’t know now. I’d say it’s small talk.
Small talk is a way to gauge someone’s mood before going for the bigger discussions


So I know you’re joking but I want to make the point so there’s no mistake from you or anyone scrolling by in what this guy means.
He means black people. Like the whole of this statement is targeted at black people in the US. Dude is a hard-r neonazi.


We do, supreme judicial authority is given to the SC in article 3 of the Constitution. This person you’re replying to isn’t being very clear that the explicit power to overturn laws was established in Marbury v Madison.
This power is called Judicial Review and it was understood to be the way the SC is supposed to work. A Federalist power grab by John Adams forced the SC to be explicit and say “we can overturn laws because that’s the only way the SC is coequal to the other branches”.
In other words, Judicial Review was always an IMPLIED POWER of the court, but a court case made them spell it out.
All the comments here jumping to talk about how wrong this is, I gotta ask: haven’t you seen a bad movie?
Art films or blockbusters (or rather, attempts at blockbusters), plenty of movies just suck. Many bad movies will have endless amounts of people trying to change the narrative with the words on the right column.
Or maybe all art house films get described this way when, like any other art form, plenty of them just suck.
Sometimes a movie just sucks and won’t accept that it sucks.
I don’t really think it does. I’d think an awful bigoted woman would want to have an orgasm during sex just as much as anyone else.
Want and deserve, tho, are very different.