They could just run only things he says as political messages.

Still, nothing seems to work for people that are part of the cult.

He is a drunk that does this a lot. It doesn’t deserve an article.

Half the world doesn’t think that.

Lukashenko sold his country and nation to the horror and suffering that is Russia.

I doubt everyone will be on board with this.

Of course. The other side is doing it, why shouldn’t they? It was a big mistake to not let them in the first place. Many many people are dead because of it.

Which one is that. I guess I’ve been left out of the loop.

Yes, you are completely right. Have fun! Never challenge yourself! Bye!

Why would I engage in this weird dance of morons? You know very well you can get all the data and statistics about crypto usage in seconds. You don’t need me to show you if you want to know. But you don’t. You want to argue. That’s not my thing. Sorry.

Anybody with an Internet connection can rebute it just by googling it. So there is really no argument necessary.

But I don’t want to engage in such low level high emotion exchanges.

Not with you either. Bye.

I think you will be happiest if you continue to belive whatever you already belive. Have a nice day. Bye.

Sorry I don’t care enough to argue about crypto. I bet you can get any kind of information about this imaginable.

The only real use is not crime. There is not really that much crime involvement. That’s a myth. They could pass a lot of regulation that wouldn’t have any effect on value.

So : don’t go after very specific people who also have money? Id say most people in crypto will agree that regulation is necessary and support it, on the other hand it should be obvious they will fight against blanket hate and actions that will make them lose value.

Lol. I can’t believe that even in this case all the shits in the world decided to go into this together.

We have had many predictions like that before. I believed in some and I take myself to be quite conservative in these estimations. What I saw is that none of them actually happen as an event, but very gradually. The best example is artillery shells. Media has predicted that Russia will run out of shells many times, but it doesn’t happen of course, because thats not how the world works. They just reduce consumption. This reduction was not big enough for any media to even report.

What im trying to say is that there is very likely not going to be an event when Russia cracks. As sanctions are applied, workarounds are found. They have enough people by sheer numbers to at least defend the front for many years to come.

Not significantly. For now Russia made sufficient changes to endure and project an appearance of stability.

That’s not the point. The point is when will this effect the war? Significantly. Enough to matter to Ukraine.

Russian economy is going towards ruin…

… but it’s not nearly fast enough to have a substantial impact on the war in Ukraine. Russia is good to fight for another 2 or 3 years, maybe an additional year if they really push it. Can Ukraine do that? Not unless NATO seriously ramps up high tech weapon deliveries.

Well, that’s not entirely true is it. This territory is not known to have been a place missiles. Plus, Ukraine will not be able to take enough land to even make it a buffer zone for artillery, let alone missiles.

This land is a liability. You need many troops to defend it that could be somewhere else. That’s a fact. The is only a question Wether the pros outweigh the cons.

Of course we don’t know more than Ukrainian commands. We are speculating and talking. But they make mistakes as well. In war there is a game of probabilities and risks.

In this case it’s just words. Russians know they are invading foreign lands.