There’s no reason to make these people pretend-soldiers. You can make them US Army contractors if they need to work with the army. You can make them DoD or CIA or NSA federal employees. There are already avenues for war mongering businessmen to take to work with the military.
I’m confused and I don’t know how to ask questions about this topic without sounding like a mouth breather, I’m sorry for my autism: why label yourself at all then if there’s no rigid definition?
Wouldn’t it be easier to have no label rather than a label whose definitions do not fit you? My spouse is pansexual and doesn’t enjoy when people lump pansexuals and bisexuals together. I admittedly don’t understand entirely why and would like to hear from somebody bisexual who has an opposing opinion on that so I can better understand
I mean this with no judgement and much curiosity
The 3.5% nonsense is a pattern, not a rule.
Then wouldn’t the “in practice” inclusive bisexual people be pansexual by definition
Is it normal for presidential medical records to be released to the public? I’ve never heard of this before
One story about this for you. MI during the first Trump presidency. There was much said in my office when he tweeted top secret satellite imagery in 2019. My chief went around the shop after this and sat with everybody, and made sure they knew what happened, how this leak got an Intel source burned, how much time/money/effort was wasted from that burned source, how much harder it will be for us to keep the boots-on-ground out there safe, etc.
The tone of the workplace was set after that: “We are here to do our job and keep the guys in the field from getting killed. Our leaders have, and will continue, to make that mission difficult.”
I mean it’s totally possible to set up weird loans like this, but I’d love to see some information proving that’s what Musk did for Twitter
Source on him using Tesla shares as loan collateral? That’s not really how loans work
I’ve watched the entirety of breaking bad, it’s mid