Yes

  • 0 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle






  • The term used in norway is ‘Forvaring’, which under conditions such as risk of repeating the offense, or inspiring others to do similar things (probs a few others too) means it can get extended. This extension can happen more than once if the risk is dermed to be real, or if they show no/insufficient degrees of rehabilitation.

    So while i cant see the actual future, its extremely unlikely he will walk free, ever. What he’s doing here is, again (as this aint the first time he complained), publicity for his views.

    And the worst part…

    Ultimately he failed in his explicit goal to spark an uprising but in a sense he was successful in other ways. Partially inspiring that dude in NZ (christchurch?) and so on, but domestically his actions did help shift the political landscape to the right, and it was a blow to thenlabour party which they are still reeling from to this day.

    Edit: he had also legally changed his name to “Fjottolf Hansen”.











  • There’s a question here tho:

    Was this because of the sanctions, or because, one might suggest, that russian space tech hasnt advanced as you’d expect the last few decades? Maybe because the people who built the roscosmos stuff back in the cold war are now dead from old age, taking some important knowledge with them to the grave? :o




  • Dishonest? Nice claim, care to back it up? If you can?

    The standard is simple; provide something beyond a surface level claim. Or at least make an effort to make the claim seem reasonable. In this example, the original commenter you’ve jumped to defend portrays the dems as if its all their fault… but is it? As mentioned, there is the figurative elephant (gop) in the room, and all the shit they do, but … No, the focus was on having selected biden. Not only that but also implying the blm marches were the root cause. But what about the reason for the marches? Or the actions by the elephant? Its not that the context doesnt exist just because, we all know it does. So, to then argue as if that context is gone… why should we take that as a serious and legit addition to the conversation, when its really not?

    Its also amusing to see you call me/us “dishonest”, as it seems to be the exact thing you are currently doing. Theres a word for this, and it is, besides being a tried and true tactic of the elephant: projection. Accusing others of what you yourself are or have been doing yourself.

    So how about it?