DivineDev

Maybe you should consider that language isn’t fixed and words change meanings all the time, especially recently coined “internet” words.

Sir this is the second post from the top for me. Ok I already refreshed 15 times but let’s not consider that

Why can’t you do the dishes at the same time? If the fish is wrapped tightly enough it should be fine.

They think USA bad (based), Russia good (cringe)

Yes, short people are inherently untrustworthy anyways.

Until their partner finds the note and gets distrustful of them. Sure, in a stable, long-teen relationship it probably won’t be an issue but I’d rather not have some random person try to drive a wedge my relationship.

Nazi oppression is an issue.

It’s not happening enough

3/4 objectively correct, not bad.

Humans have the reasoning and introspection required to make the choice to not do unnecessary harm to animals, a lion does not.

I’m not a native English speaker though I’m good enough at it that I usually understand sayings and proverbs without issue. I’ve never heard of this cowboy <something> however.

Cowboy logic

looks like we’ll have to replace 🤡 with 🤠 now

Fairphone is most well known ethical manufacturer, then there’s also Shiftphone.

And that’s why you don’t do racist, sexist or pedo jokes online. No matter how obviously non serious you think you are, some idiot will agree with you.

Edit: added missing word

Just keep it up, he has trouble controlling himself when he’s angry and might just accidentally let something slip

Probably took them 3 tries to line up in the correct order

In German there’s the saying “macht Sinn”, which is wrong since it’s just a direct translation of “makes sense”. Correct would be “ergibt Sinn”, in English “results in sense”, but I don’t care, “macht Sinn” rolls off the tongue easier.

It could just be a bug bite, but I’m hoping he punched a wall in anger over the Epstein files.

I fully agree. Companies should belong to the people that allow I to turn a profit, and that is, well, every employee. The founders could still remain the CEOs if they do a good job and are elected to do so.

So progressives must decide whether they hide from the term, enabling the fearmongering, or openly embracing it to show there is nothing wrong with it.

I’ve been wondering, what if they just ran in the opposite direction? Don’t call it “state-owned industry” or “collective ownership”, but instead “Hypercapitalism: every citizen is a shareholder!”

Exactly, the wording is extremely important when talking about policies. People like “helping the poor”, but people hate “welfare”, because that’s communism or something.