That would violate the Treaty of Versailles
CheezyWeezle
- 0 Posts
- 21 Comments
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Mothers know that this is a wholesome combination.9·1 year agoCalpis isn’t carbonated tho, at least none of the Calpico branded stuff I’ve had. Milkis is very similar and is carbonated, so it would probably be closer to this. Personally I like both Calpico and Milkis, they are definitely not my favorite but they are good to have every once in a while, owing especially to their unique taste.
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto politics @lemmy.world•Bernie Sanders Calls for ‘NO MORE’ U.S. Funding For Netanyahu’s ‘Illegal, Immoral, Brutal, and Grossly Disproportionate War’ in Gaza15·1 year agoUm, what party do you think Bernie is a member of? He is pretty famously an independent…
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•Hong Kong holds 'patriots only' local elections after shutting out oppositionEnglish12·1 year agoLmao you are actually incapable of good faith, probably because of how obviously angry you are hahaha
You are still trying to argue that your idealized theoretical version of communism is what needs to be accepted, but that a corrupted and condemned version of capitalism is what capitalism is inherently at its core. By your own standard, communism is equally abhorrent because of how it has been actually implemented in the past.
A company getting bailed out is not capitalism. It is socialism. A capitalist society implementing corporate socialism is a corruption of the core ideology of capitalism. I will agree that it is the end goal of corporatism, but corporatism is a corruption of capitalism.
And wow you really still don’t get the “no true scotsman” thing… I mean you probably do but once again, you are only putting bad faith forward. Since you clearly need it spelled out in detail, let me just copy this excerpt from the Wikipedia article on “No true Scotsman”:
The “no true Scotsman” fallacy is committed when the arguer satisfies the following conditions:[7][3][4]
not publicly retreating from the initial, falsified assertion
offering a modified assertion that definitionally excludes a targeted unwanted counterexample
using rhetoric to hide the modification
Oops, you accidentally did all those things. You never retracted your assertion, you modified the assertion with further qualifiers, and tried to downplay that further qualification. You actually pulled a “no true scotsman” on a statement about someone being a scotsman. It’s so on the nose that you MUST be a troll lmao
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•Hong Kong holds 'patriots only' local elections after shutting out oppositionEnglish32·1 year agoI think you may have read the wrong comment, because nothing you have said makes any sense in response to my comment. I’m not irritated in the slightest and nothing I have said even suggests that lmao
But please go ahead and project more
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•Hong Kong holds 'patriots only' local elections after shutting out oppositionEnglish12·1 year agoCapitalism is absolutely not functioning as intended and has 100% been corrupted… if capitalism worked as intended, then why have companies been “bailed out” from failing naturally under capitalism? Capitalism has failed just as much as everything else has failed, and has been corrupted by the people in charge just the same. Communism doesn’t work, Capitalism doesn’t work, nothing we have right now works.
And you literally still don’t understand the concept of “no true scotsman” lmao. It is also known as the “appeal to purity”. Let me be more clear:
If someone has Scottish ancestry, is born in Scotland, naturalises to Scotland, or is born and raised within largely Scottish culture, they are Scottish. It doesn’t matter where that person was born or where they live. To say that someone cannot be Scottish unless they fit your specific definition and criteria is the exact fallacy being referenced, and you actually just doubled down on that thinking that it somehow makes you not guilty of that fallacy? Wild.
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•Hong Kong holds 'patriots only' local elections after shutting out oppositionEnglish315·1 year agoLmao what side are you on? Your entire rhetoric is equally critical of and applicable to communism. If communism is allowed to be viewed as an ideology that has been corrupted, then capitalism is exactly the same. You don’t get to cherry pick and say “you have to look at A with rose-colored glasses and you only get to accept the idealized version of it, but you must only look at the bad things that have come from B and don’t get to accept its ideals!”
Also you literally went full “no true scotsman” at the end, literally verbatim lmao. You actually just tried to say that one of the most well known fallacies is not a fallacy hahaha wtf is wrong with you
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•Solar storm to hit Earth on November 30, will disrupt mobile communicationEnglish13·1 year agoWhy and how would the electronics in an airplane be melted? Airplanes are naturally a Faraday cage, and all the components are going to be EMF shielded anyways.
The only thing an airplane would need to worry about with a solar storm is the increase in radiation exposure, and even then it’s only relevant for the Flight crew who have limits on how much radiation they can be exposed to per OSHA.
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•Solar storm to hit Earth on November 30, will disrupt mobile communicationEnglish231·1 year agoPlanes wouldn’t just fall out of the sky anyways lmao. Even if planes lost communications completely they are still operational flying machines. It would just be very difficult to coordinate planes landing at that point. I don’t know about the protocols, but I’m sure there exist failsafes to coordinate air traffic in the event of radio communication loss.
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•German-Israeli Shani Louk is confirmed dead, 3 weeks after Hamas captured her and paraded her through GazaEnglish1910·2 years agoWhen you declare a genocide on a group of people don’t be surprised when they fight back.
So, to be clear here, you are condemning Israel here, correct? The ones who are actually perpetuating a genocide?
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto politics @lemmy.world•Growing Number Of Anti-Jim Jordan Republicans Are Reporting 'Credible Death Threats’572·2 years ago“When I voted for the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party, I didn’t think they would eat MY face!”
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto politics @lemmy.world•Dog breed bans are about human prejudice — not the dogs5·2 years agoSorry, but you made the claim so the burden of proof lies on you.
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto politics @lemmy.world•Dog breed bans are about human prejudice — not the dogs101·2 years agoSources?
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto politics @lemmy.world•GOP congressman calls for execution of “sodomy-promoting” US Army general2·2 years agoYeah, at the very least I don’t see how the US could declare someone as their enemy without declaring war on them. Declaring someone as your enemy is basically saying you are going to war with them, even if it is a cold war.
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Horseshoe Theory of Breakfast Meals31·2 years agoOk wtf this is literally spot on, my work supplies breakfast and it’s always different but my two staples are a monster (usually the zero ultra, too…) and stepping outside to hit my vape…
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto politics @lemmy.world•GOP congressman calls for execution of “sodomy-promoting” US Army general4·2 years agoTreason in the USA is specifically giving aid or comfort to enemies of the United States. As far as I am aware there are no official enemies of the United States, so technically it is not possible to commit treason unless the United States wants to officially announce a foreign power as an official enemy of the US, which would be a possible casus belli against them. Treason is a tricky charge to try.
CheezyWeezle@lemmy.worldto politics @lemmy.world•Slightly higher times: Biden administration moves to loosen weed restrictions2·2 years agoWhat makes you say that dispensaries can’t pay their employees in cash? That’s a total legal and fine thing to do… why wouldn’t it be? A business cant pay their employees in money? I know plenty of people who are paid in cash, including a few dispensary workers…
Call me Ishmael, cuz I got a Moby Dick
Anyone got a mirror? It would be nice if catbox didn’t block vpn traffic, I’m not disabling my vpn for a meme