• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I explicitly said the DNC had pivoted away from neoliberalism…

    It’s only bad when the DNC is corrupt, and that stopped being true like 17 months ago.

    I held my nose and voted Kamala, but enough people didn’t that it made the voting members of the DNC pivot away from neoliberalism

    Why are you defending the DNC that pulled all the bullshit in 2024?

    It seems like you don’t understand that when the chair changes, it’s essentially the same as a new person becoming president, just with zero oversight or accountability.

    That’s the only way it makes sense someone would be honestly conflating the two.

    I hate making assumptions though, can you let me know if that’s what happened here?

    • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      You should totally keep adding names, terms, and pretending there’s some sort of intersectional group that meets your definition of villain. “ I mention this and Leo lib that plus my feelings of this…”

      Reality is your comments are worth nothing and you have less than nothing to offer otherwise.

      It’s Neo this and Neo that! The lib this and lib that! It doesn’t matter if people lean liberal! Neo lib this and that!

      Keep on with “the chair” and keep whining but reality is past that and you should honestly stop. Youve nothing to add so just honestly… STOP!

      Not just stop but Neo-stop!

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s Neo this and Neo that! The lib this and lib that! It doesn’t matter if people lean liberal! Neo lib this and that!

        Are you honestly trying to pretend that Modern American neoliberalism doesn’t exist?

        Like, you’re acting like I made it up…

        The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order analyses the history of a political order that emerged in the United States in the 1970s and 1980s, dominated American politics in the 1990s and 2000s, and fractured during the 2010s when Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders rose to prominence. Its power was built on an array of donors, policy entrepreneurs, and politicians that coalesced under Reagan. That coalition overturned the regulatory regime and ideological hegemony of New Deal order that had dominated American politics for forty years and made neoliberalism America’s dominant creed of political economy. The book argues that neoliberalism is a better term than conservatism for understanding the politics of this era. At the same time, it reworks the meaning and significance of neoliberalism. First, it insists that neoliberalism was much closer in character to the ideology of 19th century classical liberalism than is commonly acknowledged. Second, it argues that an elite-driven model for understanding neoliberalism is not sufficient to understand this ideology’s broad appeal; one must also reckon with how its promise of individual freedom drew both working-class Americans and erstwhile New Leftists to its banner. Third, the book identifies the collapse of the Soviet Union and of its legitimating ideology—communism—as critical factors in the neoliberal order’s triumph and restores the centrality of the Cold War to an understanding of our time. The book concludes with an analysis about how the problems left unsolved by the neoliberal order paved the way for Donald Trump’s rise and triumph.

        https://academic.oup.com/book/41850?login=false

        It’s a thing…