Mickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 个月前They have already decided to promote an existing employee. But play the "search" game and screw youlemmy.worldimagemessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1613arrow-down14
arrow-up1609arrow-down1imageThey have already decided to promote an existing employee. But play the "search" game and screw youlemmy.worldMickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 个月前message-square48linkfedilink
minus-squareoriginalucifer@moist.catsweat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up53·4 个月前in government positions, search is sometimes mandated. i once competed for a job for which i was the current temporary contractor, and they asked me to write the job description. somehow i got the job. does that count?
minus-squareFinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldcakedeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-21 个月前deleted by creator
minus-squareEat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 个月前They’re called position descriptions and just about every job in fed gov has one, probably a third of them are standardized, and other third are just lightly modified standard PDs.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 个月前I think mandating search is good but they should have a clause for a case like yours
in government positions, search is sometimes mandated.
i once competed for a job for which i was the current temporary contractor, and they asked me to write the job description.
somehow i got the job. does that count?
deleted by creator
They’re called position descriptions and just about every job in fed gov has one, probably a third of them are standardized, and other third are just lightly modified standard PDs.
deleted by creator
I think mandating search is good but they should have a clause for a case like yours