Mickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agoReligions have some of the wackiest ruleslemmy.worldimagemessage-square138linkfedilinkarrow-up1958arrow-down155
arrow-up1903arrow-down1imageReligions have some of the wackiest ruleslemmy.worldMickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square138linkfedilink
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·2 years agoThey are clearly not talking about the legitimate, medically necessary cases
minus-squareLeroyJenkins@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·2 years agonot really… they said any. they didn’t give any indication they might have an exception to that. sounds like they’re talking about a blanket ban.
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoI’ve never heard of any circumcision opponent being against medically neccesary procedures. Only supporters using it as a bad faith argument
They are clearly not talking about the legitimate, medically necessary cases
not really… they said any. they didn’t give any indication they might have an exception to that. sounds like they’re talking about a blanket ban.
I’ve never heard of any circumcision opponent being against medically neccesary procedures. Only supporters using it as a bad faith argument