• Garibaldee@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m only pointing out he’s trained as a physical therapist to highlight that he is not trained in a field relevant to this whatsoever, you can be a critical thinker without being a journalist or going to college, but this person just decided they would be the arbiter of what media bias was in the 2016 US election and has just run with it. Most people do not realize this is just some guy’s opinions, if it was named “David Van Zandt’s blog on media bias” people would probably trust it less than naming it “MediaBiasFactCheck” which makes it sound like it’s not just the opinions of one random dude.

    • psyklax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always thought the ratings were based on a community or a team of people deciding based on hard criteria. Shame…

      • Garibaldee@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I think it’s very deceptive in how it markets itself. I think the only reason you see it so much in sites like lemmy and reddit is it went viral during the 2016 US election, where discussions of “fake news” and media bias really took off for the first time and people have just been trusting it ever since.