Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoLooking for answersslrpnk.netimagemessage-square143linkfedilinkarrow-up11.79Karrow-down119
arrow-up11.77Karrow-down1imageLooking for answersslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square143linkfedilink
minus-squareskillissuer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down7·2 years agoPacifism is only good for aggressors and cowards
minus-squarego $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down3·2 years agoNon-violence != Pacifism A person can be an advocate for non-violence and not be a pacifist. No need to conflate the two, particularly when people have so much hate and vitriol for any perceived pacifism.
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 years agoArguably, accepting the necessity of occasional violent protest is more reasonable than giving up pacifism.
Pacifism is only good for aggressors and cowards
Non-violence != Pacifism
A person can be an advocate for non-violence and not be a pacifist. No need to conflate the two, particularly when people have so much hate and vitriol for any perceived pacifism.
Arguably, accepting the necessity of occasional violent protest is more reasonable than giving up pacifism.