usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agoTrump insults Detroit during speech … in Detroitwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square69linkfedilinkarrow-up1521arrow-down111
arrow-up1510arrow-down1external-linkTrump insults Detroit during speech … in Detroitwww.theguardian.comusernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square69linkfedilink
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoNow now, while that might seem the perfect solution, we can’t violate the Geneva convention.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoThe Geneva convention doesn’t say anything about that song. So it’s all good. Right?
minus-squarebluewing@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoMeh, it’s never a war crime the first time. Go for it.
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoActually, I think it probably does specify that particular song . . .
minus-squareMegaUltraChicken@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoI think if you just used a 3 second clip on loop that should pass constitutional muster.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoWell, it’s a convention and not a hard and fast rule, anyway.
deleted by creator
Now now, while that might seem the perfect solution, we can’t violate the Geneva convention.
The Geneva convention doesn’t say anything about that song. So it’s all good. Right?
Meh, it’s never a war crime the first time. Go for it.
Actually, I think it probably does specify that particular song . . .
I think if you just used a 3 second clip on loop that should pass constitutional muster.
Well, it’s a convention and not a hard and fast rule, anyway.
Why reward them?