Is Donald Trump really trying to get out of debating Kamala Harris again? Or is it the opposite?

On Thursday, it seemed like the dust had finally settled. “The debate about debates is over,” said Michael Tyler, the Harris campaign communications director, in a statement. “Donald Trump’s campaign accepted our proposal for three debates—two presidential and a vice presidential debate.”

“Assuming Donald Trump actually shows up on September 10 to debate Vice President Harris, then Governor Walz will see JD Vance on October 1 and the American people will have another opportunity to see the vice president and Donald Trump on the debate stage in October,” the Harris campaign continued.

But now, Trump’s team claims that the Democrat lied when she said the two sides reached a debate agreement. At the moment, there is only one confirmed debate between the presidential nominees, to be held September 10 by ABC News.

Nevertheless, the Trump campaign’s press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Daily Caller Friday that Trump will be doing three debates and Vance will be doing two.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 年前

        I don’t have a pro-Christian or pro-Abrahamic bias.

        True, you have an anti-Christian, anti-Abrahamic balance. Why else would you be so offended by the idea that a Jew, with followers, executed on orders of the Roman governor of Judea, Pontius Pilate, during the reign of the Emperor Tiberius, existed?

        I don’t think any such figure existed, and was a wholesale invention.

        I don’t think you exist and are a wholesale invention. There’s no proof to the contrary.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 年前

            How many gods and religions do you not believe in?

            If anyone told me “Zeus was actually based on some guy from early Greece that we have historical evidence for” my reaction to that would be more along the line of “Oh, that’s interesting” instead of “Your evidence better be pretty overwhelming!” Knowing Saint Nicholas was a real person doesn’t mean I’m mailing Christmas lists to the north pole. The origins of things are interesting, and I’m not going to argue with experts in the field (historians), that’s how you get Flat Earthers.

            Seek psychiatric help, you’re being rude to people that don’t exist.

            Ya right, like I’m going to take advice from a figment of my imagination. That’s something a crazy person would do!

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 年前

                I’m autistic and logical.

                How logical is it to tell someone you’re blocking them and then continue to reply to them? You don’t sound very logical to me.

                I don’t identify as a human.

                JFC, you’re an idiot. There were other responses to make but I’m talking to someone who can’t even be convinced that they are human, “historians know more than you” is so far down the list of priorities of things you need to come to grips with. Find yourself a therapist you can talk to.