Biden's third such address will be something of an on-the-job interview, as the nation's oldest president tries to quell voter concerns about his age and job performance while sharpening the contrast with Donald Trump.

That was one of the more interesting SOTU addresses I’ve seen. Personally, I think he said most of the things that needed to be said, and he said them reasonably well. I’m sure he’s going to get some flack for attacking Trump directly (though not by name), but I was frankly glad to see it. Doing otherwise makes it seem like it’s just your typical election/political disagreements, but we’re past that now.

            • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
              272·
              2 years ago

              Did he mention that under his watch women lost their bodily autonomy

              Wow, that’s rich. Biden and the Democrats have been fighting against that very thing. It’s being done in Republican controlled states, supported by a Republican majority Congress. Yes, he talked about it.

              It’s like punching him in the nose and then saying you won’t vote for him because he’s got blood on his face.

              • kava@lemmy.world
                312·
                2 years ago

                obviously the republicans are more to blame for the roe v wade repeal, but Democrats have blood on their hands too. It’s been half a century since 1974 and the Democrats have had many majorities and presidencies since then. At no point did they pass some sort of abortion bill.

                and joe biden has been a leading figure in the democratic party for nearly as long

                • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
                  72·
                  2 years ago

                  The majority of Americans felt Roe was the right stance - that abortions should be legal with restrictions, and that states should have a say in those restrictions. Stocking SCOTUS with conservatives (in part by refusing to confirm a judge nominated by a Democrat), and then overturning Roe wasn’t something most realized needed to be fought against.

                  And, regardless, you posted the thing about it happening on his watch as an argument against him - which means you prefer the ones they’re fighting against, the ones who are actively trying to take away a woman’s ability to oversee her own healthcare. How does that make sense?

    • oortjunk@sh.itjust.works
      21·
      2 years ago

      Was that before or after he stared down the Magat trolls and beyond-obviously-corrupted supreme court justices to their faces?