Trash Brain
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
zephyreks@lemmy.mlM to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago

US Claims Huge Chunk of Seabed Amid Strategic Push for Resources

www.bnnbloomberg.ca

external-link
message-square
30
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • world@lemmy.world
123
external-link

US Claims Huge Chunk of Seabed Amid Strategic Push for Resources

www.bnnbloomberg.ca

zephyreks@lemmy.mlM to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago
message-square
30
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • world@lemmy.world
US Claims Huge Chunk of Seabed Amid Strategic Push for Resources - BNN Bloomberg
www.bnnbloomberg.ca
external-link
The US extended its claims on the ocean floor by an area twice the size of California, securing rights to potentially resource-rich seabeds at a time when Washington is ramping up efforts to safeguard supplies of minerals key to future technologies.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Trudge [Comrade]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Canada’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs didn’t respond to a request for comment

    lol

    • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not enough seals were detected in those areas

  • 420stalin69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Securing my rights to the last piece of Christmas ham by licking all the Christmas ham.

    • wildncrazyguy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      People licking meat in here?

      • library_napper@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hopefully cocks and not dead animal carcass

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this is the announcement?

    https://www.state.gov/announcement-of-u-s-extended-continental-shelf-outer-limits/

    I’m unclear which but is the new change

  • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    the geometry of the claims looks oddly specific. Have they discovered something in those areas?

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      UNCLOS has rules defining where the continental shelf boundary can be considered to extend to, so it’s probably wherever that line is (with carveouts for where it meets Russia and Canada’s equivalent claims). This type of claim is only for the sea bed, not the water column, so it hasn’t been economically viable to exploit in the past. That might be changing with the increased importance of rare earth metals

    • guitarsarereal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey Canada. Do something. Canada, are you ded ?? 🤣🤣🤣

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oink

  • nekandro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    China attempts to maintain their territorial claims in the South China Sea after the Philippines and Vietnam conduct island-building operations there in the early-00s: CHINA BAD!!!

    America expanding their territorial claims in the Pacific because they want more natural resources: Yeah, this is fine and reasonable and democratic.

    Canada, who gets no say in the matter because we’re entirely reliant on the US for trade and defence: fuck, eh?

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      China bad

      America bad

      Simple

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One of these claims is compatible with UNCLOS, the other absolutely is not. The US pulls plenty of international dickery, including not ratifying UNCLOS, but this claim fits within that existing international law just fine

      • nekandro@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except it’s not really compatible with UNCLOS.

        The US interpretation of UNCLOS would allow them to claim like half the Pacific

        • Skua@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What do you think isn’t in line with it? This isn’t an exclusive economic zone claim.

          • Sharpiemarker@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Removed by mod

          • nekandro@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Part XI

            • Skua@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              There are 58 articles in part XI. Which ones are you talking about?

    • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nice whataboutism.

      • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Stick to the point, though. This is a dick move (increasing the territorial claims, that is - not pointing out whataboutism, that’s all good!)

        • guitarsarereal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • Skua@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It should be noted that claim is not the same as the better-known exclusive economic zone. The continental shelf thing is only for seabed resources, not stuff in the water column. But that’s all that the US is claiming, so it is indeed in line with UNCLOS

          • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’d argue that expanding the zones a bit doesn’t incur costs other than updating some maps, as existing radar systems etc were already reaching into the newly claimed areas, undoubtedly.

            Am I worried about my country’s creeping reach, and have I suddenly realized there’s yet another way to slowly encroach on territory? Yes.

            E: why the downvotes?

            • guitarsarereal@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

    • Virkkunen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find it amazing how every time you see the shittiest take in this community, it’s a lemmy.ml user. It never fails.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That or hexbear but yeah

    • library_napper@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, they’re both bad

      • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not allowing your fledgling government to simply be devoured by the world empire doing illegal empire shit is as bad as being the empire.

        Do you also think having a gun for protection is the same as having a gun for robbing people?

        • Bloobish [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          So ngl when we say death to America that also includes Canada as another terrible settler state with a horrid fucking past and still pretty shit present, so like to be honest don’t really care when a modern day fascist state is consuming/fucking over it’s smaller petite fash state upstairs neighbor.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nor do I, but it’s the hypocrisy that interests me

            • Bloobish [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What hypocrisy? It’s like if Nazi Germany decided to gobble up fascist Italy, both horrid rancid countries deserving of destruction. Fascist countries don’t get to play victim when they get devoured by a larger fascist state they work alongside as a literal 2nd player in the North American stage.

              Just to be sure we are talking about Canada right?

        • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            In this case China, their government being only 50 or so years old at the time

    • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • nekandro@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Literally the same bullshit getting pulled in the South China Sea.

        “This ocean is all MY ocean, because I said so”

        (oh oops there’s oil there teehee completely unrelated)

World News@lemmy.ml

worldnews@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !worldnews@lemmy.ml

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 526 users / day
  • 1.2K users / week
  • 4.42K users / month
  • 13.3K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 36.2K subscribers
  • 14.5K Posts
  • 136K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
  • Jack.@lemmy.ml
  • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org