I’m referring to all people participating here who you think will be convinced by anything Project Veritas has to say. Sadly for you, no one participating appears to be convinced.
If video surveillance of educators and administrators admitting to injecting propaganda into their curricula is not “proof” then you surely would look for a second opinion to confirm your bias : you absolute dullard.
You cannot deceptively edit people into saying things they didn’t say. You are a laughably bad attempt at appearing to use logic and reason, but you cannot look any dumber when saying they “Deceptively edit” footage. 😂😂😂😂
So I see no reason to believe anything they present. Why should I take a proven liar’s word for anything? “It’s on video?” Great. Do they show the context? No.
This is your one and only chance to stop insulting me before I end this conversation and block you. This is not Reddit and I will not put up with such incivility.
Project Veritas? Are you shitting us right now?
Who are you referring to as “us”? It does seem like this is an astroturf post that would be a natural echo chamber on reddit.
I’m referring to all people participating here who you think will be convinced by anything Project Veritas has to say. Sadly for you, no one participating appears to be convinced.
Is it not proof of people injecting propaganda into education?
If Project Veritas showed “proof” water was wet, I’d get two other opinions.
If video surveillance of educators and administrators admitting to injecting propaganda into their curricula is not “proof” then you surely would look for a second opinion to confirm your bias : you absolute dullard.
Video from the group that constantly deceptively edits video? Yeah, again, are you shitting us?
You cannot deceptively edit people into saying things they didn’t say. You are a laughably bad attempt at appearing to use logic and reason, but you cannot look any dumber when saying they “Deceptively edit” footage. 😂😂😂😂
Are you claiming they don’t deceptively edit footage?
Literally the second sentence of their Wikipedia entry says so.
So I see no reason to believe anything they present. Why should I take a proven liar’s word for anything? “It’s on video?” Great. Do they show the context? No.
.
This is your one and only chance to stop insulting me before I end this conversation and block you. This is not Reddit and I will not put up with such incivility.
If you truly don’t believe footage can be deceptively edited, I got some bridges to sell you