Without control of the White House, there is of course only so much Democrats can do with their newfound power. And in the context of the myriad horrors of the first half of President Donald Trump’s second term, talking about what the party “should” do next is roughly analogous to deciding which out-of-control forest fire to fight first: There is not enough water, there are lots of worthy candidates, and all of them are getting worse.
One thing must be true, though: Whatever issues Democratic lawmakers choose to focus on—and, as the 2028 ideas primary gets underway, whatever ambitious ideas Democratic presidential hopefuls choose to support—the party must also have a plan for taking on the Supreme Court, which remains an existential threat to anything Democrats might hope to accomplish. Even if the party is fortunate enough to win a trifecta—the House, the Senate, and the White House—in 2028, things like a Green New Deal and Medicare for All and a new Voting Rights Act do not stand a chance before this six-justice conservative supermajority. Regrettably, what I wrote in 2020 is just as true today: If Congress passes any one of these proposals into law, the only real question is which justice ends up writing the opinion that kills it.



Here’s another thing that needs to be addressed:
In 1789 each house representative represented roughly 5000 voters.
Each senator represented roughly 14000 voters.
In 2026 each house representative represents roughly 600,000 voters.
Each senator represents roughly 2.5 million voters.
I’m not sure that system was meant for scale.
The Senate was made that way deliberately. It’s not based on population.
The point is that when this system was created, the number of people you had “power over” ostensibly, were far far fewer than today. And scale matters a lot.
If you have a hundred people, and one raving lunatic cult psycho, that’s easily contained.
If you have three hundred million people, you suddenly have an army of three hundred thousand raving lunatic cult psychos with serious political sway coming your way.
Ok but, to be fair, they planned for population and territory explanation. I think manifest destiny was after the revolutionary war but it’s kinda silly to think that they thought the country wouldn’t like, grow.
I’m not saying that it is functional, but thinking that just because things were different when the Constitution was made doesn’t mean change wasn’t taken into account. Hell some of them thought we should rewrite the entire thing every few years.
The designers figured that was a next generation problem and that people will be smart enough then to figure it out.
The future people, apparently, was not.