Sam Bankman-Fried, the former crypto mogul who was convicted of defrauding investors by secretly diverting billions of dollars of their money, asked the Supreme Court on Thursday for a new trial and to throw out a court order requiring him to pay $11 billion as part of his sentence.

    • ExtremeDullard@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Well, in theory anybody is allowed to petition the Supreme Court to arbitrate their case if they feel all the lower courts they where dealt with below it did them wrong, and the Supreme Court reviews the case and decides to take it or not.

      In theory.

      In practice, the court’s clerks will not even read your petition unless your case is exceptionally complex, very public, you’re a billionaire or you’re an orange fascist dementia patient.

  • FluidBeef@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s like we finally get one of these creeps and they keep popping back up again. Money really is a blight.

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      Have you seen the supreme court? He does have a chance. Of course the fact that he’s not in the supreme leader’s favor counts against him, but if he’s got any money left a little donation to Clarence has worthwhile odds of sorting him out.

    • ExtremeDullard@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It doesn’t cost anything to try. If I was sentenced to 25 years in the slammer and $11bn in restitution, I’d try anything to lighten the sentence.

      Or I’d off myself, because I’d be mortified with shame in his place. But I’m not a criminal.