• wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The reason good people don’t need rules is because they wouldn’t violate them even if they did. Using that to rationalize being a jerk is misapplying it.

        If you’re a “good man,” you wouldn’t be using the r-slur in the first place. The exact cognitive dissonance which allows fascists to be fascists is that they believe themselves to be good people and therefore don’t need rules. But instead of actually being good people, they use this as an excuse to be terrible to others.

      • TootTootComingThru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        17 hours ago

        *Noooo don’t call an actual real life monster and a fascist a no no word noooo that makes you just as bad as them nooooo! *

          • TootTootComingThru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            I can get over minor things and words that don’t matter just fine. Can you? Thick skin and resilience matters a whole of a lot more than nagging other people about certain words.

            • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Thick skin and resilience matters a whole of a lot more than nagging other people about certain words.

              [citation needed]

        • braxy29@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          so calling him any slur is okay, or just this one?

          i mean, fuck that guy, but that word has a heavy and hateful impact on some people. i just think it’s easier for people to ignore that one than to ignore several others, unfortunately.

  • Discountsoup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    One of my daughters has CP and we use the term ironically often… is retard really becoming a slur? We think it’s fine if you’re not special needs around these parts. However if you called a special needs person retarded then its basically fighting words.

  • omghi@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    For the record the Twitter page that article is talking about (‘I Find Retards’) is a right-wing Twitter page. Previously considered retards: trans people and those with Down Syndrome, and anyone remotely left-wing. They use ‘retard’ because they don’t care about minorities and like ‘edgy humor’. Why do you use it, then? Don’t make your hatred of fascists make you forget about your fellow disabled Dems, like me.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We’ve made a bit of progress. In the past, such a post would be immediately banned, simply for having the word in the title. As if the word itself is magical apart from context and intent.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You can tell it’s a slur because of how haughty people get when you tell them they can’t say it. Lol they really want to be able to say it.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        Because they were using the r-slur? That only makes sense. It’s against the community rules, is it not? The mods here never claimed to be free speech absolutists.

        If you think the problem here is that people aren’t allowed to use the r-slur, you completely missed the point of the article.

        The hypocrisy is the main issue. This admin cries about how people can’t say the r-slur anymore, and then they get butthurt and threaten abuses of power when it’s used against them.

        Weaponizing the FBI against some jerks on the internet is a huge part of the problem too. Enforcing conduct and language standards falls on content moderation teams, not federal law enforcement. That doesn’t mean the whole internet should be the wild west. Unless you’re okay with nazis spouting hate? Because that’s what you’ll get with free speech absolutism.

        So honestly I really don’t get you’re point. Should the mods not remove comments that use slurs, and ban repeat offenders?

    • dbtng@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Man, I agree with you, but these are the rules:

      “All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed.”

      How you execute a consistent set of policies when the rules say you don’t have to be consistent is beyond me.

      • foodandart@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        LOL! I think it’s one of those “read the room first” situations.

        I’ve always said Kash Patel deserves 100% of the shit the GOP spews thrown right back in his “special needs” face… but that IS a slur against the actual people that are disabled, since Patel isn’t really needing of any special treatment or help… beyond the karmic swift one in the pants he so deserves.

        Which should be given with extreme wit, vigor and prejudice.