Also, this rings of saying its not murder because transgender people aren’t people.

No, it’s implicitly saying the murderer was ‘right’ to kill her because she was ‘really a black man.’ The jury was ‘deceived, by omission, into thinking this was about a woman being murdered.’

[Single quotes indicate their expressed beliefs, not direct quotes.]

I believe the IDF’s “military capability” is largely subsidized by the US sending nearly-unconditional aid, and because of their ideology riling them up for their chance to shoot civilians during their stint in military service.

I do think forcing the West to bear arbitrary reorganization of their borders, for once, would be “funny.” But who is going to force them to when neither the Israelis nor any European country would want that? The West could have enforced the Israeli project on the Middle East (even if Zionists weren’t salivating for the chance to colonize the area) in lieu of Jewish support.

Quoting a different one of my comments in this thread:

You’re just recommending the same course of actions that the US North took against the Confederacy. And we see how well that worked out for stomping out their noxious belief today.

If you just board up the building bigots spewed out hate from without stopping the people with bad thoughts from propagating them, then they’ll set up shop somewhere else. You have to dig them up by the roots.

But killing people for “bad thoughts” isn’t a great road to start walking down. So we arrive back at my original comment.

Who are these ‘many people’ trying break up and disperse Palestine, except Zionists? “Let them get their country back” is what you ‘do’ with them.

I’m not sure what you’re saying here at all, particularly because “that case” is indefinite. Whose case are you referring to: the real apartheid of Palestinians, or the hypothetical dissolution of Israel?

I thought “Hell” was a Christian invention that didn’t exist in Judaism?

Zionists really took that as a license to do anything.

We are clearly talking about different things.

Obviously, you stop funding them but that doesn’t fix Israel. You’re just recommending the same course of actions that the US North took against the Confederacy. And we see how well that worked out for stomping out their noxious belief today.

If you just board up the building bigots spewed out hate from without stopping the people with bad thoughts from propagating them, then they’ll set up shop somewhere else. You have to dig them up by the roots.

But killing people for “bad thoughts” isn’t a great road to start walking down. So we arrive back at my original comment.

My question is: what to do with them?

You can’t break them up and disperse them. We tried that with Nazis after WW2 and that just seeded Nazis everywhere that formed cores for Nazi sympathizers to rally around.

Probably not great to lock them up in the country, like Cuba, either. It won’t fix their cancerous ideology…and most of their land is stolen.

Really, any actions will only fuel their persecution complex, and they’ll weave that into the indoctrination they install into the following generations of Israeli.

Once is a coincidence. Twice? Basically Gandhi.

…he shares a few proclivities with Gandhi, in fact.

That face reads as abject terror at the thought of the situation happening to her. Did she narrowly lose the raffle to be the obstructionist on this one?

Peeping poltergeists ain’t nothing to poke fun at

Overheard by an LG TV

This is why you should always lead with cunnilingus: to bait out their reverses and +4s.

Subscribe to my Substack for my self-help series: “Uno Sex, Please.”

Every one will believe. And the 50(?)% of them that will get ejected will think that their personal case was the only mistake. Everyone else was rightfully stopped from committing “fraud”, but MAGA just has to fix this one, little whoopsie where they got caught in the dragnet on accident.

They wanted “small governement”*.

*government that doesn’t restrict them from doing whatever they want.

Racism isn’t based on anything rational.

Racists can laugh alongside members when a comedian makes joke referencing a shared culture. And the only way to differentiate between the appreciative and the mocking is the tone of the laughter. You may not have been making an insult, but that’s why it said it dovetails.

It seems you’re focused on the specifics of “insulting mockery of Chinese speech” being a broad insult when comparing it to your joke. I don’t think the other person was claiming they were exactly the same joke, but were in the same category. Although I could be wrong. “Literally” has unfortunately come to mean both what it means and “not literally, but used for heightening.”

While there are English versions of the joke, like a prolific fucker being named Dick Hammer, it just dovetails with the racist jokes that are simply mocking a name because it’s foreign.

Translation: not forcing people to suffer and die for being born on the wrong side of arbitrary lines on a map in a foreign country that my country and their allies bombed, sanctioned, and otherwise manipulated into poverty.

They wouldn’t leave their homes [edit: in the numbers racists complain about], if their countries were fine. And their countries aren’t fine as a result of decades, if not centuries, of exploitation and political and economic meddling/espionage from the West/“global north”.

Wow, who would have known it was UK racism that outs the most blatant racists? Have I just dodge all of y’all before?

Oh, cool. I don’t often see an unabashed racist in Lemmy comments. Nice to see one who isn’t pussyfooting around, so I know I can cleanly block you.

“It’s not that surprising.” is what I wrote. It’s the very first sentence.

Not that surprising. A relative phrasing requiring the first measure to be a benchmark, e.g. “yeah, it’s kinda sad but not that sad.”

So hung up on what I “said” when it seems like you misread and misinterpreted it.

“It’s not that surprising” and then I gave examples of how you could reframe “social justice warrior” into the long history of people mocking well-meaning people who were viewed as excessive…