

“7 steps are pretty clear…”
you do not have seven steps.
you have provided pages of vague prefaces and conclusions sandwiched around disconnected musings about how seeing beyond a hypothetical veil could occur if one were provided with a hypothetical procedure that reaches no conclusion.
“This exchange is going nowhere healthy or positive - I am all for debates”
you are failing in this exchange. you ask what people think, people are telling you. you don’t want to accept it.
“if you are happy within this dimension…”
you don’t think those beyond your understanding pop into this dimension?
you are truly limited.
If you ask people if they agree with your conclusions, and we say no, and your conclusion is “then you are not thinking how I am thinking so you must be wrong”, then the problem is with your narrow perspective and your question, not with everyone else.
“Myth of Sisyphus…”
if you insist on falsely claiming spiritual ownership of a tired metaphor, try Cassandra instead of Sisyphus.
you’re pretending to have prophetic insights that no one else will heed, you aren’t performing some endless onerous task by tip tapping vague, nonlinear shower thoughts into your phone.
“there is much more out there than meets the eye…”
don’t assume or conflate your own narrowed perspective with the awareness of others.












“if vitamins were effective, they’d use them for beating children!”
You’re misunderstanding the use of debate.