Developer for 30+ years, father of four.
I consider your argument the more ethical one. If an animal is going to die, isn’t the most humane method the most ethical? However, I also see the other side, which is giving the animal the chance to kill the human first. It’s kinda twisted logic. If you’re going that route then the most humane method would be not kill them at all.
You would think it was this one
But you’d be wrong. JD is the biggest tool.
I think it’s the phrasing “consider themselves at war” that is causing the down votes.
What is worse?
I am almost half again as old as you are.
Oh come on. Be serious. Is your health secretary up for eating roadkill and hosting a video of himself and Zoid Rock?
That’s a terrible way to say something I truly agree with.
People who lack basic empathy or sympathy for other people.
Bullshit. It’s not age verification. It’s identification of you.
Aha. That explains all the rape kits that got unprocessed every year.
I don’t understand people who misunderstand basic consent.
Impersonating a person, living or dead, could absolutely be a law. It’s pretty simple. It’s the same with all consent. Do you enthusiastically consent to me beating the shit out of you? If the answer is yes, then let’s goooooo. If the answer is no, then I’ll remove your restraints and wish you well. It’s not fucking hard.
I’m gonna pour some water on this hyperbole. Yes, Ebola is definitely a terrible thing. However, this is not a global threat, no matter how much they try to inflame you.
I just recently subscribed to Dropout. These people are so funny.
Mmmm yes. Two tons of sugar.
My cat is fucking obsessed with drinking from my bath when I’m in it.
Like that
I agree with you, and you are technically correct which I guess is rubbing people the wrong way.