no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 个月前Let delivery drivers keep theirlemmy.worldimagemessage-square61linkfedilinkarrow-up1750arrow-down123
arrow-up1727arrow-down1imageLet delivery drivers keep theirlemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 个月前message-square61linkfedilink
minus-squareKirca@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up49·11 个月前 top 1.9% of only fans This is a complete aside, but does anyone feel like putting “top 2%” sounds better than “1.9”? Like when I hear top 2 percent I think wow this person is somewhere between 1.5 and 2% but 1.9 makes me think 1.90 to 1.99. Maybe it’s just me.
minus-squarefrank@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·11 个月前Completely agree, the mystery makes me rank them higher than knowing
minus-squareThatGuy46475@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-211 个月前That’s the idea behind significant figures in high school science 1.9 is more precise because it has 2 significant figures
minus-squarebitwolf@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 个月前I was going to say. I see so many touting this. Does OF tell everyone they’re top 1.9%?
This is a complete aside, but does anyone feel like putting “top 2%” sounds better than “1.9”?
Like when I hear top 2 percent I think wow this person is somewhere between 1.5 and 2% but 1.9 makes me think 1.90 to 1.99.
Maybe it’s just me.
Completely agree, the mystery makes me rank them higher than knowing
Think that’s the joke.
That’s the idea behind significant figures in high school science
1.9 is more precise because it has 2 significant figures
I was going to say. I see so many touting this. Does OF tell everyone they’re top 1.9%?